Home  FAQ  Search  Memberlist  Usergroups  KDR  Register  Log in  

Share | 
 

 SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
Germanic Fox



Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-09-23

PostSubject: SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...   Fri 27 Sep 2013, 11:33 am

Note this is quickly replacing evolution and becoming the new model with the resistance from nihilistic atheist spectrum and basically claiming by proxy a more meaningful view of the universe more in line with Spinoza which is a step back towards Christian thinking....        


UNIVERSAL SYMBIOGENESIS 179
It is indeed impossible to distinguish, let alone count, allthe elements that are borrowed or mixed in a givenlanguage or culture. But this does not
a priori
entail that itis not worth the effort to examine how many elements became merged throughout the course of its history.Universal symbiogenesis would thus introduce and allowfor concepts such as interaction and cooperation that oftenoperate in the humanities, notions that are often countered by concepts of competition (see e.g. Speidel, 2000), and assuch the concept of universal symbiogenesis cancomplement and/or counter cost-benefit equations and ideason selfishness.
9. Conclusion
The theory of evolution by means of natural selectionand universal selectionist accounts that grew out of themhave turned out to be very useful tools to model theevolution of life and various products of life. However, itcannot explain all the different types in which evolution canoccur and produce evolutionary novelty. If natural selectionwould indeed be able to explain all of life’s evolution, thenand only then, would it be an unscientific theory for atheory that explains everything explains nothing. The latter however is not the case.Faultfinders have rightly argued that the ModernSynthesis focuses exclusively on the mechanism of naturalselection to explain evolution. It has been argued that theModern Synthesis presents a sterile view of evolution(Sapp, 2004: 1049) for it fails to include the microcosm,which results in an evolutionary theory only applicable tozoology (Margulis and Sagan, 2002). The focus oncompetition and cost-benefit equations naturally excludescooperative and altruistic views since both are antagonisticcounterparts (Speidel, 2000), and organisms as well asspecies are, within a (post-)neo-Darwinian view,understood to be independently evolving entities (Margulisand Sagan, 2002).Here, symbiogenesis – which does not regard evolutionas a sterile process – allows for cooperative views and,following Margulis ideas, sees all organisms as chimeras, isoffered as a complementary view. Symbiogenesis can beuniversalized as well and can include at minimum theepidemiology of viruses, hybridization, cultural andlanguage evolution and even certain cosmological processes. Universal symbiogenesis even has potential inmedical applications. And also – not discussed here – epigenetic processes can be absorbed into a universalsymbiogenetic scheme, because the different interaction of the same genes lead to the emergence of new traits andsometimes even result in speciation.The already often used notion of a
symbiont
by scholarsworking within a symbiogenetic framework can thus beapplied as a universal, evolutionary epistemologicalconcept as well, where it can complement Dawkins’replicators and Hull’s interactors.The enormous potential of an evolutionary view basedon symbiogenesis is yet to be felt in many extra-biologicalfields and also within evolutionary biology itself. It would be an enormous waste not to explore this potential and todismiss symbiogenesis
a priori
as a “would-be challenger”to selectionism. The universal symbiogenetic formula presented in this article will contribute in a positive way tomaking the importance of symbiogenesis more widelyknown in these other fields of research.
Acknowledgements
Sincere thanks to the Fund for Scientific Research,Flanders, the Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Scienceand the Research and Development Department of the VrijeUniversiteit Brussel. A warm thanks also goes out toFrancisco Carrapiço (botanist) and Frank Ryan (virologistand MD) for revising earlier drafts of parts of this paper.Roslyn Frank (cognitive linguist) is cordially thanked for commenting on the linguistic aspects described in this paper and for revising the whole paper in order for it to bein accordance with English grammar and orthography.Finally, Rik Pinxten (anthropologist) is also thankedsincerely.REFERENCES
Ayala, F.J. 1978. The mechanisms of evolution.
Scientific American

239
: 48–61.Boas, F. 1962.
Anthropology and Modern Life.
W.W. Norton andCompany, New York. [First published in 1928].Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Nunn, C.L., and Towner, M.C. 2006.Cultural Macroevolution and the transmission of traits.
Evolutionary Anthropology

15
: 52–64.Bradie, M. 1986. Assessing evolutionary epistemology.
Biology & Philosophy

1
: 401–459.Brandon, R.N. 1982. The levels of selection. In:
Genes,Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection
. Brandon, R.N. and Burian, R.M., eds. 1984,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp.133–139.Callebaut, W. 1993.
Taking the Naturalistic Turn or How Real  Philosophy of Science is Done
. The University of ChicagoPress, Chicago, IL.

Callebaut, W. and Pinxten, R. 1987. Evolutionary Epistemologytoday: Converging views from philosophy, the natural andsocial sciences. In:
Evolutionary Epistemology: A Multiparadigm Program with a Complete Evolutionary Epistemology Bibliography
. Callebaut, W. and Pinxten, R., eds.Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 3–55.Campbell, D.T. 1959. Methodological suggestions from acomparative psychology of knowledge processes.
Inquiry

2
:152–183.Campbell, D.T. 1974. Evolutionary epistemology. In:
The Philosophy of Karl Popper
Vol. I, Schlipp, P.A., ed. La Salle,IL, pp. 413–459.

180 N. GONTIER Campbell, D.T. 1997. From evolutionary epistemology viaselection theory to a sociology of scientific validity: Edited byCecilia Heyes and Barbara Frankel.
Evolution and Cognition

3
:5–38.Carrapiço, F. and Rodrigues, T. 2005. Symbiogenesis and theearly evolution of life.
Proceedings of SPIE

5906
: 59060R-1-4.Carrapiço, F. 2006. The origin of life and the mechanisms of  biological evolution.
Proceedings of SPIE

6309
.Changeaux, J.P. 1985.
Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind
.Oxford University Press, New York.Chavez, L.R. 2006. Culture change and cultural reproduction:Lessons from research on transnational migration. In:
Globalization and Change in Fifteen Cultures: Born in oneWorld and Living in Another.
Stockard, J. and Spindler, G., eds.Thomson-Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Croft, W. 2000.
Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach
. Pearson, Essex.Croft, W. 2002. The Darwinization of linguistics.
Selection

3
: 75– 91.Cziko, G. 1995.
Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theoryand the Second Darwinian Revolution
. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology, Cambridge, MA.Darwin, C. 1859.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
John Murray, London.Dawkins, R. 1976.
The Selfish Gene
. Oxford University Press, New York.Dawkins, R. 1982. Replicators and vehicles. In:
Genes,Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection
. Brandon, R.N. and Burian, R.M., eds. 1984,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp.161–179.Dawkins, R. 1983. Universal Darwinism. In:
The Philosophy of  Biology
. Hull, D.L. and Ruse, M., eds. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 15–35.Dennett, D. 1995.
Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life.
Penguin Books, London.Dyson, F. 1988.
Infinite in All Directions.
Penguin Books,London.Dyson, F. 1998. The evolution of science. In:
Evolution: Society,Science and the Universe
Fabian, A.C., ed., CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 118–135.Dyson, F. 1999.
Origins of Life: revised edition.
CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, MA.Eigen, M. 1996
. Steps towards Life: A Perspective on Evolution
.Oxford University Press, New York.Eigen, M. and Schuster, P. 1977. The Hypercycle: a principle of natural self-organisation. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle.
Naturwissenschaften

64
: 541–565.Fischer, R.A. 1931. “The evolution of dominance.”
Biological  Review
6
: 345–368.Fox, S.W. and Dose, K. 1972.
Molecular Evolution and the Originof Life
. W.H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco, CA.Gilbert, W. 1986. The RNA world.
Nature

319
: 618.Gontier, N. 2004.
De oorsprong en evolutie van leven.
Vubpress,Brussels. [The origin and evolution of life.]Gontier, N. 2006a. Introduction to evolutionary epistemology,language and culture. In:
Evolutionary Epistemology, Languageand Culture.
Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., and Aerts, D.,eds. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–29.Gontier, N. 2006b. Evolutionary epistemology and the origin andevolution of language: Taking symbiogenesis seriously. In:
Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture.
Gontier, N.,Van Bendegem, J.P., and Aerts, D., eds. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 195–226.Gontier, N. 2006c. Evolutionary epistemology.
The internet  Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. h
Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marcoand the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist program.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
, B
205
:581–589.Hannerz, U. 1980.
Exploring the City: Inquiries toward an Urban Anthropology
. Colombia University Press, New York.Hannerz, U. 1992.
Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning.
Colombia University Press, NewYork.Hannerz, U. 2002. Flows, boundaries and hybrids: Keywords intransnational anthropology. Stockholm University, Departmentof Social Anthropology, Unpublished manuscript: 1–25.[Translation of: Hannerz, U. 1997. Fluxos, fronteiras,híbridos: palavras-chave da antropologia transnacional.
Mana
(Rio de Janeiro)
3
: 7–39.]Hull, D.L. 1980. Individuality and selection.
Annual Review of  Ecology and Systematics

II
: 311–332.Hull, D.L. 1981. Units of evolution. In:
Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection
.Brandon, R.N. and Burian, R.M., eds. 1984, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, pp. 142–159.Hull, D.L. 1988.
Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science.
TheUniversity of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Hull, D.L. 2002. Species, languages and the comparative method.
Selection,
3
: 17–28.Ingold, T. 1986.
Evolution and Social Life
. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, MA.Kroeber, A.L. 1963.
Anthropology: Culture Patterns and  Processes.
Harbinger Books, New York. [First edition 1923]Lewontin, R. 1970. The levels of selection.
Annual Review of  Ecology and Systematics
1
: 1–18.Lewontin, R. 2000.
The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and  Environment.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Mallet, J. 2006. Species concepts. In:
Evolutionary Genetics:Concepts and Case Studies
. Fox, C.W. and Wolf, B., eds.Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 367–373.Margulis, L. 1999.
The Symbiotic Planet, a New Look at  Evolution
. Phoenix, Orion Books, London.Margulis, L. and Dolan, M.F. 2002.
Early life: Evolution on the Pre-Cambrian Earth,
second edition. Jones and BartlettPublishers, Sudbury, MA.Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. 2000.
What is Life?
University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. 2002.
Acquiring Genomes: A Theoryof the Origin of Species.
Basic Books, New York.Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. 1995.
The Major Transitionsin Evolution
. Oxford University Press, New York.Mayr, E. 1997.
Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected  Essays.
Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA.Mufwene, S. 2002. What do Creoles and Pidgins tell us about theevolution of language? Unpublished manuscript available at: Mufwene, S. 2005. Language evolution: The population geneticsway. In:
Genes, Languages and their Evolution
. Hauska, G., ed.


UNIVERSAL SYMBIOGENESIS 181Universitätsverlag Regensburg, Regensburg, pp. 30–52.Oparin, A. 1955.
L’origine de la vie.
Editions en languesétrangères, Moscou.Orgel, L.E. 1994.
Scientific American

271
: 53–61.Pinxten, R. 1997.
When the Day Breaks. Essays in Anthropologyand Philosophy.
Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Pinxten, R. and De Munter, K. 2006.
De culturele eeuw.
Houtekiet, Antwerp. [The cultural century]Pinxten, R. and Dikomitis, L. in preparation. Urban religion or secularisation: the meaning of life as a modern predicament. In:
Urban Religion or Secularisation: Some Anthropological  Examples.
Pinxten, R. and Dikomitis, L., eds.Plotkin, H. 1995.
Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge:Concerning Adaptations, Instinct and the Evolution of  Intelligence
. Penguin Books, London.Quine, W.V. 1969. Epistemology naturalized. In:
Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology.
Bernecker, S. andDretske, F., eds. 2000. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp.266–78. [First published in Quine, W.V., 1969,
Ontological  Relativity and Other Essays
69–90. Colombia University Press, New York. Original title: Naturalized Epistemology.].Richards, R.J. 2002. The linguistic creation of man: CharlesDarwin, August Schleicher, Ernst Haeckel, and the missing link in 19th-century evolutionary theory. In:
Experimenting inTongues: Studies in Science and Language
. Doerres, M., ed.Stanford University Press, Stanford, MA, pp. 21–48
.
Roosinck, M. 2005. Symbiosis versus competition in plant virusevolution.
Nature Reviews, Microbiology

3
: 917–924.Ruse, M. 1988.
Taking Darwin Seriously.
Blackwell Publishers,Oxford.Ryan, F. 2002.
Darwin’s Blind Spot: Evolution beyond Natural Selection
. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.Ryan, F. 2004. Human endogenous retroviruses in health anddisease: a symbiotic perspective.
Journal of the Royal Society of  Medicine

97
: 560–565.Ryan, F. 2006. Genomic creativity and natural selection: a modernsynthesis.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

88
: 655– 672.Sapp, J. 2003.
Genesis: The Evolution of Biology
. OxfordUniversity Press, New York.Sapp, J. 2004. The dynamics of symbiosis: an historical overview.
Canadian Journal of Botany

82
: 1046–1056.Sapp, J., Carrapiço, F., and Zolotonosov, M. 2002.Symbiogenesis: the hidden face of Constantin Merezhkowsky.
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

24
: 413–440.Schwartz, J. 1999.
Sudden Origins, Fossils, Genes and the Emergence of Species.
John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.Senghas, R.J., Senghas, A., and Pyers, J. 2005. The emergence of  Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development,acquisition and evolution. In:
Biology and Knowledge Revisited: From Neurogenesis to Psychogenesis.
Langer, J.,Parker, S., and Milbrath, C. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
,
Mahwah, NY, pp. 287–306.Speidel, M. 2000. The parasitic host: symbiosis contra Neo-Darwinism.
Pli,

The Warwick Journal of Philosophy

9
: 119– 138.Villareal, L. 2004. Can viruses make us human?
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society

148
: 296–323.Villareal, L. and Defilipps, V. 2000. A hypothesis for DNAviruses as the origin of eukaryotic replication proteins.
Journal of Virology
74
: 7079–7084.Wuketits, F.M. 1990.
Evolutionary Epistemology and its Implications for Humankind.
State University of New York Press, New York.Zook, D. 1998. A new Symbiosis language...
ISS Symbiosis News

1
: 1–3.

182 N. GONTIER
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Germanic Fox



Posts : 38
Join date : 2013-09-23

PostSubject: Re: SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...   Fri 27 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm

Basically I love how kids think Darwin is a rebel and such. Kids are taught if God is involved it is a machination of the authority. I think My Little Pony Friendship is Magic caught on due to it shows what embracing ones connection to the Universe means and kids were shocked by how cool that was rather then shows which tell kids to go it alone and such. The Grime Adventures of Billy and Mandy was kept on air for quite a while due to it's episodes were basically about how everyone else is stupid and the universe is pointless. I love how kids believe South Park is rebellious and cool and edgy. South Park is basically a series of poop jokes and cracks with the illusion of plot because they always joke about a controversial issue like gay marriage or something. Does anyone realize that what is considered rebellion is basically supporting some big agenda rather then thinking for yourself that isn't some gay friend of mine. I have really decided that gays are the last true free thinkers in the world. But anyway people get mad at for watching C-Span, Al-Jazerra and Link TV and being into conspiracy theories. Since I get my info from a variety sources my step-mom tells me I am conspiracy theorist since I rarely believe anything she does. Global Warming... I believe in it but I don't buy the Democrats Solution of oh carbon taxes and carbon credits and I believe actual life style changes so dad calls me a republican due to that is what MSMBC tells him anyone who disagrees with his views is... Meanwhile I deny the belief that Christianity is bad and basically except for that time Chick-a-fila was like Gays bad I supported and since I support running companies in a Christian Way I am ignorant and homophobic despite that I am bie myself and don't believe that people should dictate sexual molarity beyond saying no molesting kids and abusing animals or disabled people. I think the media gives kids a choice between supporting one form of BS or another. Kids in First Priority think they are rebels and kids who dress in black and misquote Friedrich Nietzsche on God think they are too. The whole grade school teaches kids that voting between a Giant Dosh and a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich is the basic thing which makes them better then a third world dictator ship in which people evilly actually get fed and taken care of.... Meanwhile North Korea is so evil according to the two radio rebels while I learn that the North Korea Army grows tons of mushrooms to feed the poor of the world and that those third world give our northern states lots of food to feed the poor and the northern states get budget surplus from allowing evil dictators to help them out.. WOW... Meanwhile Liberals love Europe but not European immigration which are stricter then the US. To rebel is basically promoted as having no friends and neglecting your family and voting one of the two parties and believe in kiddy Christianity or Atheism and deny your connection to the universe.

Am I right....
Back to top Go down
View user profile
C1
Admin


Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...   Sun 06 Oct 2013, 7:18 pm

posting to add this thread to my watch list, so I can return later to read.

_________________
"For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."
David Thoreau (1817-1862)
anonymously email me by clicking here
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...   

Back to top Go down
 
SYMBIOGENESIS AND ORDER IN BIOLOGY...
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Transfer Ownership in order to change domain name?
» China’s brutally pragmatic response to a shifting world order
» THE GREAT WAR MEDAL COLLECTORS COMPANION
» Lightning McQueen Cake
» I guess the gag order is still in effect

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWWS :: Main Forums :: Religion & Faith-
Jump to: