| Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Bertiz
Posts : 1 Join date : 2013-03-04
| Subject: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Mon 04 Mar 2013, 9:49 am | |
| Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Washington gov. Jay Inslee made it known to wide public. Underground waters have been contaminated! I guess the authorities were just unable to hide the fact. They just had to warn the locals to stay alert. I guess quite a lot of people there have their own wells to get water..... Generally I tend to think reality is far more scaring in this country than they report! Small arms trade ban, shale gas dubious technologies leading to ecological disasters in many states here, Muslims flooding the country, those are all alarming things as I see it! And the biggest irritant for me is lack of true information actually! They want us live here with our eyes closed and our lips sealed! Nope! That's not for me! Planning to leave for some friendlier place on the globe. So your piece of advice would be really helpful! | |
|
| |
C1 Admin
Posts : 1611 Join date : 2009-10-19
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Mon 11 Mar 2013, 1:23 pm | |
| How can one verify that this radioactive waste leakage story is true? _________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."David Thoreau (1817-1862) anonymously email me by clicking here | |
|
| |
ScoutsHonor
Posts : 1360 Join date : 2009-10-20
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Fri 15 Mar 2013, 10:25 am | |
| - C1 wrote:
- How can one verify that this radioactive waste leakage story is true?
Yes. Actually, how can one trust that anything reported by the so-called news medis is true?? That is the intolerable truth of our situation. | |
|
| |
C1 Admin
Posts : 1611 Join date : 2009-10-19
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Sat 23 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm | |
| bottom line, nuclear is an energy option that is meant to be a non-option. Energy must be a resource-scarcitty if one is going to justify limits to popultaion and limits to wealth (of course, this only applies to the public) _________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."David Thoreau (1817-1862) anonymously email me by clicking here | |
|
| |
ScoutsHonor
Posts : 1360 Join date : 2009-10-20
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Sun 24 Mar 2013, 12:44 pm | |
| - C1 wrote:
- bottom line, nuclear is an energy option that is meant to be a non-option. Energy must be a resource-scarcitty if one is going to justify limits to popultaion and limits to wealth (of course, this only applies to the public)
Not sure of what you mean; do you mean it's Not really meant to be utilized in any practical way (as in there being a hidden agenda involved)? Please clarify. My own opinion is that it is as yet too 'untamed' to be viable; they still haven't even figured out how to dispose of the @#$#%@ Waste!! Talk about irresponsibility....ye gads!! So if you suspect another agenda I'd say there's reason to do so... ... | |
|
| |
C1 Admin
Posts : 1611 Join date : 2009-10-19
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Sun 24 Mar 2013, 2:53 pm | |
| - ScoutsHonor wrote:
- C1 wrote:
- bottom line, nuclear is an energy option that is meant to be a non-option. Energy must be a resource-scarcitty if one is going to justify limits to popultaion and limits to wealth (of course, this only applies to the public)
Not sure of what you mean; do you mean it's Not really meant to be utilized in any practical way (as in there being a hidden agenda involved)? Please clarify.
My own opinion is that it is as yet too 'untamed' to be viable; they still haven't even figured out how to dispose of the @#$#%@ Waste!! Talk about irresponsibility....ye gads!! So if you suspect another agenda I'd say there's reason to do so... ...
If you want to convince the public that we live in a resource-scarce world, and therefore suppress their wealth and limit population, one can't have an unlimited energy resource. Hence, nuclear will never be allowed to be viable, even if it already is, because it obliterates all the propaganda that we live in a resource-limited world. _________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."David Thoreau (1817-1862) anonymously email me by clicking here | |
|
| |
ScoutsHonor
Posts : 1360 Join date : 2009-10-20
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Sun 24 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm | |
| - C1 wrote:
- ScoutsHonor wrote:
- C1 wrote:
- bottom line, nuclear is an energy option that is meant to be a non-option. Energy must be a resource-scarcitty if one is going to justify limits to popultaion and limits to wealth (of course, this only applies to the public)
Not sure of what you mean; do you mean it's Not really meant to be utilized in any practical way (as in there being a hidden agenda involved)? Please clarify.
My own opinion is that it is as yet too 'untamed' to be viable; they still haven't even figured out how to dispose of the @#$#%@ Waste!! Talk about irresponsibility....ye gads!! So if you suspect another agenda I'd say there's reason to do so... ...
If you want to convince the public that we live in a resource-scarce world, and therefore suppress their wealth and limit population, one can't have an unlimited energy resource. Hence, nuclear will never be allowed to be viable, even if it already is, because it obliterates all the propaganda that we live in a resource-limited world. Very interesting! I should have **known**....and it explains some other things that haven't made sense to me...but do now. All of that Fukushima bull, for example. Thanks a LOT for the insight, C1. P.S. I reckon the "Peak Oil" people also have a vital interest in this...among many many others. Huh. | |
|
| |
C1 Admin
Posts : 1611 Join date : 2009-10-19
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! Sat 30 Mar 2013, 4:28 pm | |
| - ScoutsHonor wrote:
- C1 wrote:
- ScoutsHonor wrote:
- C1 wrote:
- bottom line, nuclear is an energy option that is meant to be a non-option. Energy must be a resource-scarcitty if one is going to justify limits to popultaion and limits to wealth (of course, this only applies to the public)
Not sure of what you mean; do you mean it's Not really meant to be utilized in any practical way (as in there being a hidden agenda involved)? Please clarify.
My own opinion is that it is as yet too 'untamed' to be viable; they still haven't even figured out how to dispose of the @#$#%@ Waste!! Talk about irresponsibility....ye gads!! So if you suspect another agenda I'd say there's reason to do so... ...
If you want to convince the public that we live in a resource-scarce world, and therefore suppress their wealth and limit population, one can't have an unlimited energy resource. Hence, nuclear will never be allowed to be viable, even if it already is, because it obliterates all the propaganda that we live in a resource-limited world.
Very interesting! I should have **known**....and it explains some other things that haven't made sense to me...but do now. All of that Fukushima bull, for example.
Thanks a LOT for the insight, C1.
P.S. I reckon the "Peak Oil" people also have a vital interest in this...among many many others. Huh. Peak Oil - another fabrication. We've got more resources than we know what to do with. The Russian have proven that "some" oil is self-replicating, in that the oil deposits replenish themselves. _________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."David Thoreau (1817-1862) anonymously email me by clicking here | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! | |
| |
|
| |
| Six underground radioactive waste tanks at Hanford are leaking! | |
|