hmm- don't remember posting such a series, but I do remember Charlie from a very clever video he made posing as a NWO hotshot. He made a lengthy speech (in this video) detailing all the reasons he was so darn superior. AND of course, how doomed we were, deservingly so of course. Ha ha.
Look forward to watching this one, if it's anywhere near as **slick** as his last one. Thanks for posting, Incognito
ScoutsHonor
Posts : 1360 Join date : 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Charlie Veitch 'Comes Clean' Tue 12 Jul 2011, 11:05 am
ScoutsHonor wrote:
hmm- don't remember posting such a series, but I do remember Charlie from a very clever video he made posing as a NWO hotshot. He made a lengthy speech (in this video) detailing all the reasons he was so darn superior. AND of course, how doomed we were, deservingly so of course. Ha ha.
Look forward to watching this one, if it's anywhere near as **slick** as his last one. Thanks for posting, Incognito
Additional thought for you: Have YOU been able to understand the psychology of these type of people-- I mean the sellouts to the NWO ideology? Drives me nuts trying to understand how guys like Alex J. are able day after day to tell Lie after Lie, without absolutely destroying the functioning of their own minds. Then again, AJ very often does seem on the verge of 'cracking up' right on the air - does he not! Sheesh.
I refuse to say or propagate anything Vietch on crackbook by the way.
Didn't watch the entire video as dear Adam really grates on my nerves. He's such a thorough going phony- now he seems to be playing the role of a Jon Stewart/Steven Colbert type... but this 'reporter' role is something he was professionally coached in and yet he's still not convincing at all. which makes me chuckle..
Regarding Veitch, well guess what ..I don't think that is HIM! Check out some of his earlier videos and I think you may see it the way I do. This fellow LACKS the sardonic humor of the real Mr. Veitch, IMHO. Why this might be, (if it is so) I really don't know --except that it's insanity time everywhere these days, it seems. Big *SIGH.*
Re: Crackbook 'propagating': what does this mean? Pls elucidate. :-)
incognito
Posts : 788 Join date : 2009-10-20 Location : in the rainforest
Subject: Re: Charlie Veitch 'Comes Clean' Sun 17 Jul 2011, 12:55 pm
Buy Propagating I mean posting a link that others will repost, then others will repost. This is a meme I refuse to participate in (except here LOL).
C1 Admin
Posts : 1611 Join date : 2009-10-19
Subject: Re: Charlie Veitch 'Comes Clean' Sun 17 Jul 2011, 7:13 pm
ScoutsHonor wrote:
ScoutsHonor wrote:
hmm- don't remember posting such a series, but I do remember Charlie from a very clever video he made posing as a NWO hotshot. He made a lengthy speech (in this video) detailing all the reasons he was so darn superior. AND of course, how doomed we were, deservingly so of course. Ha ha.
Look forward to watching this one, if it's anywhere near as **slick** as his last one. Thanks for posting, Incognito
Additional thought for you: Have YOU been able to understand the psychology of these type of people-- I mean the sellouts to the NWO ideology? Drives me nuts trying to understand how guys like Alex J. are able day after day to tell Lie after Lie, without absolutely destroying the functioning of their own minds. Then again, AJ very often does seem on the verge of 'cracking up' right on the air - does he not! Sheesh.
The more I study the guys who have studied the human brain, like Joe LaDue who I reference in the brain subforum here, the more I realize that Godel's theorems apply to the human brain. Namely, there are infinite possibilities of its configuration, hence, there are infinite belief systems possible. So, as man is not necessarily a rational being, he is then one who can believe any structure or hierarchy of thought. The elite, and their agents, really do believe that there are multiple classes of humans, and that it is their duty to choose the destiny for all of us.
_________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root." David Thoreau (1817-1862)
C1, if the human brain was infinitely pliable, there would not be the amount of mental illness that there is. I believe the brain is no more pliable in its requirements than an arm, leg or liver is; that is, they have their basic set structure (dynamics, cybernetic system:) and if that is violated there is trouble in the organism.
Especially do I believe this about the mind (brain), probably the most complicated, wondrous and *least understood* of all of our faculties. They should not f*ck around with it. being the ignorant jackasses that they ARE.
C1, if the human brain was infinitely pliable, there would not be the amount of mental illness that there is. I believe the brain is no more pliable in its requirements than an arm, leg or liver is; that is, they have their basic set structure (dynamics, cybernetic system:) and if that is violated there is trouble in the organism.
Especially do I believe this about the mind (brain), probably the most complicated, wondrous and *least understood* of all of our faculties. They should not f*ck around with it. being the ignorant jackasses that they ARE.
I need to think some about your post. But one comment, isn't mental illness a measurement based upon society as the baseline, or norm? I happen to think that society is mentally ill, at least according to my standards. So, how do we describe mentally ill?
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
_________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root." David Thoreau (1817-1862)
C1, if the human brain was infinitely pliable, there would not be the amount of mental illness that there is. I believe the brain is no more pliable in its requirements than an arm, leg or liver is; that is, they have their basic set structure (dynamics, cybernetic system:) and if that is violated there is trouble in the organism.
Especially do I believe this about the mind (brain), probably the most complicated, wondrous and *least understood* of all of our faculties. They should not f*ck around with it. being the ignorant jackasses that they ARE.
--------- I need to think some about your post. But one comment, isn't mental illness a measurement based upon society as the baseline, or norm? I happen to think that society is mentally ill, at least according to my standards. So, how do we describe mentally ill?
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
I will have to think about this one, C1. Up til now I've just felt I "know it when I see it", but I'll do better than that after I think it over. So, will get back to you...
Quote :
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
Yep, but what I'm maintaining is that only ONE of those ways would be a a legitimate state of "sanity."
I tried it without the sound like C1 suggested (on the other), that's where the real content is.
What I get from it is a total very contemptuous put-down of Charlie. And I'd agree.
By the way, I maintain that that isn't Charlie Veitch, unless he had some extensive plastic surgery...... The original Charlie was quite a bit older, for one thing. Hell, life's just one big three ring circus these days, no?
ScoutsHonor
Posts : 1360 Join date : 2009-10-20
Subject: Re: Charlie Veitch 'Comes Clean' Tue 26 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
ScoutsHonor wrote:
C1 wrote:
ScoutsHonor wrote:
C1, if the human brain was infinitely pliable, there would not be the amount of mental illness that there is. I believe the brain is no more pliable in its requirements than an arm, leg or liver is; that is, they have their basic set structure (dynamics, cybernetic system:) and if that is violated there is trouble in the organism.
Especially do I believe this about the mind (brain), probably the most complicated, wondrous and *least understood* of all of our faculties. They should not f*ck around with it. being the ignorant jackasses that they ARE.
--------- I need to think some about your post. But one comment, isn't mental illness a measurement based upon society as the baseline, or norm? I happen to think that society is mentally ill, at least according to my standards. So, how do we describe mentally ill?
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
I will have to think about this one, C1. Up til now I've just felt I "know it when I see it", but I'll do better than that after I think it over. So, will get back to you...
Quote :
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
Yep, but what I'm maintaining is that only ONE of those ways would be a a legitimate state of "sanity."
C1, is there any way to split this topic off into its own thread? This is probably the mother of all off-topics......yikes,haha
But I wanted to let you know I am thinking about this, and finding it to be a hell of a larger topic than I had imagined. At the moment I've reached the stage of relating it (possibly) to OODA loops -- will let you know the outcome. More thinking required for sure, in other words....
C1, if the human brain was infinitely pliable, there would not be the amount of mental illness that there is. I believe the brain is no more pliable in its requirements than an arm, leg or liver is; that is, they have their basic set structure (dynamics, cybernetic system:) and if that is violated there is trouble in the organism.
Especially do I believe this about the mind (brain), probably the most complicated, wondrous and *least understood* of all of our faculties. They should not f*ck around with it. being the ignorant jackasses that they ARE.
--------- I need to think some about your post. But one comment, isn't mental illness a measurement based upon society as the baseline, or norm? I happen to think that society is mentally ill, at least according to my standards. So, how do we describe mentally ill?
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
I will have to think about this one, C1. Up til now I've just felt I "know it when I see it", but I'll do better than that after I think it over. So, will get back to you...
Quote :
Isn't mentally ill really just proof that the brain can wire itself in infinite ways?
Yep, but what I'm maintaining is that only ONE of those ways would be a a legitimate state of "sanity."
C1, is there any way to split this topic off into its own thread? This is probably the mother of all off-topics......yikes,haha
But I wanted to let you know I am thinking about this, and finding it to be a hell of a larger topic than I had imagined. At the moment I've reached the stage of relating it (possibly) to OODA loops -- will let you know the outcome. More thinking required for sure, in other words....
Happy to split -off , just tell me which post you want to be the start of the new thread, and the subject for the new thread.
Alternatively, you can copy and past relevant content into your own new thread.
Let me know.
_________________ "For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root." David Thoreau (1817-1862)
Latest images Search KDR Register Log in 
-- will let you know the outcome. More thinking required for sure, in other words....