WWWS
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
Home  Latest imagesLatest images  Search  KDR  Register  Log in  

 

 Validating Norman Dodd

Go down 
4 posters
AuthorMessage
Ben Steigmann

Ben Steigmann


Posts : 114
Join date : 2010-05-21

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptySun 29 Aug 2010, 10:33 pm

Some people, when I showed them the Norman Dodd interview:



entered into a state of pathological denial and immediately dismissed everything. They asserted that Dodd was a "Right Wing Extremist" and that the quote he attributed to Gaither was a lie. What they don't realize is that neither Gaither nor the Ford Foundation challenged him, other power elites have made similar statements, and one can read the 7th volume of the American Historical Association's Report on the Commission on Social Studies, written in 1934, which Dodd referenced, and see that Dodd was right when he said that the AHA, funded by the Carnegie Corporation, dedicated the future of America to collectivism.

(Note: I also possess a Carnegie Endowment endorsed bibliography of books from the 1940s discussing how to build Regional and World Government. I am also in possession of an excerpt from the Congressional Record on Monday, August 19, 1940, concerning Andrew Carnegie's admissions that he wished to fulfill Cecil Rhodes' vision of uniting America and Britain and using that power base as a nucleus for World Government. This excerpt goes under the heading "Steps Toward a British Union, a World State, and International Strife".)

I will now excerpt from the AHA document:

"The Commission is under special obligation to its sponsor, the American Historical Association. Above all, it recognizes its indebtedness to the Trustees of the Carnegie Corporation, whose financial aid made possible the whole five-year investigation of social science instruction in the schools, eventuating in the following Conclusions and Recommendations." - p. xi

"the Commission could not limit itself to a survey of textbooks, curricula, methods of instruction, and schemes of examination, but was impelled to consider the condition and prospects of the American people as a part of Western civilization now merging into a world order." - p. 1

"The Commission was also driven to this broader conception of its task by the obvious fact that American civilization, in common with Western civilization, is passing through one of the great critical ages of history, is modifying its traditional faith in economic individualism, and is embarking upon vast experiments in social planning and control which call for large-scale cooperation on the part of the people." - pp. 1-2

"the Commission recognizes the further fact of the inter-relationship of the life of America with the life of the world. In all departments of culture-intellectual, aesthetic, and ethical - the civilization of the United States has always been a part of European, or "Western," civilization . To ignore the historical traditions and usages which have contributed, and still contribute, to this unity is to betray a smug and provincial disregard of basic elements in American life and to invite national impoverishment, intolerance, and disaster . Moreover, the swift development of technology, industry, transportation, and communication in modern times is obviously merging Western civilization into a new world civilization and imposing on American citizens the obligation of knowing more, rather than less, of the complex social and economic relationships which bind them to the rest of mankind." pp. 11-12

It then inserts a bunch of doublespeak exalting collectivism as a means to preserve peace, freedom, and dignity. I'll get into that more later. But meanwhile...

"there are certain clearly defined trends in contemporary technology, economy, and society of the utmost importance in creating new conditions, fashioning novel traditions, reorienting American life, and thus conditioning any future program of social science instruction." - p. 13

"Under the moulding influence of socialized processes of living, drives of technology and science, pressures of changing thought and policy, and disrupting impacts of economic disaster, there is a notable waning of the once widespread popular faith in economic individualism; and leaders in public affairs, supported by a growing mass of the population, are demanding the introduction into economy of ever-wider measures of planning and control." - p. 16

"Cumulative evidence supports the conclusion that in the United States as in other countries, the age of laissez faire in economy and government is closing and a new age of collectivism is emerging." - p.16

Of course, the Carnegie Endowment and the interlock of foundations that Quigley described were behind the people creating this collective evidence, and altering society in accordance with it (see "Foundations: Their Power and Influence").

Remember: "the power these energetic left wingers exercised was never their own ... but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie" - Tragedy & Hope, p. 954

Returning to the "American Historical Association's Report on the Commission on Social Studies"...

"As to the specific form which this "collectivism," this integration and interdependence, is taking and will take in the future, the evidence at hand is by no means clear or unequivocal. It may involve the limiting or supplanting of private property by public property or it may entail the preservation of private property, extended and distributed among the masses. Most likely, it will issue from a process of experimentation and will represent a composite of historic doctrines and social conceptions yet to appear. Almost certainly it will involve a larger measure of compulsory as well as voluntary co-operation of citizens in the conduct of the complex national economy, a corresponding enlargement of the functions of government, and an increasing state intervention in fundamental branches of economy previously left to individual discretion and initiative-a state intervention that in some instances may be direct and mandatory and in others indirect and facilitative. In any event the Commission is convinced by its interpretation of available empirical data that the actually integrating economy of the present day is the forerunner of a consciously integrated society, in which individual economic actions and individual property, rights will be altered and abridged." - p. 17

"While stressing the necessity of recognizing the emergence of a closely integrated society in America and the desirability of curbing individualism in economy, the Commission deems highly desirable the conscious and purposeful employment of every practicable means to ward off the dangers of goose-step regimentation in ideas, culture, and invention, of sacrificing individuality, of neglecting precious elements in the traditional heritage of America and the world, and of fostering a narrow intolerant nationalism or an aggressive predatory imperialism." - p.23

Massive doublespeak there. I urge people who just read that passage to see @56:33-1:02:56 of "Das Netz": http://blip.tv/file/2843830

for a massive "AHA!" moment.

Returning to the "American Historical Association's Report on the Commission on Social Studies"...

"The Commission deems possible and desirable an enlightened attitude on the part of the masses of the American people toward international relations, involving informed appreciation of the cultural bonds long subsisting among the nations of Western civilization and now developing rapidly among all the nations of the world, and special knowledge of the increasing economic interdependence of politically separate areas and peoples, and of the emerging economic integration of the globe." - p. 25

"The Commission, under the frame of reference here presented, deems desirable the vitalizing of the findings of scientific inquiry by the best social thought of the present and of the past, and the incorporation into the materials of social science instruction in the schools of the best plans and ideals for the future of society and of the individual." - p. 27

"The implications for education are clear and imperative: (a) the efficient functioning of the emerging economy and the full utilization of its potentialities require profound changes in the attitudes and outlook of the American people, especially the rising generation-a complete and frank recognition that the old order is passing, that the new order is emerging." - pp. 34-35

"Organized public education in the United States, much more than ever before, is now compelled, if it is to fulfill its social obligations, to adjust its objectives, its curriculum, its methods of instruction, and its administrative procedures to the requirements of the emerging integrated order." - p. 35

"If the school is to justify its maintenance and assume its responsibilities, it must recognize the new order and proceed to equip the rising generation to cooperate effectively in the increasingly interdependent society and to live rationally and well within its limitations and possibilities...." - p. 35

"The program of social science instruction should not be organized as a separate and isolated division of the curriculum but rather should be closely integrated with other activities and subjects so that the entire curriculum of the school may constitute a unified attack upon the complicated problem of life in contemporary society." - p. 48



Professor Harold Laski, a philosopher of British socialism, said: "At bottom, and stripped of it's carefully neutral phrases, the report is an educational program for a socialist America." (Reece Committee Transcript, p. 480: http://www.scribd.com/doc/3683140/Reece-Committee-Hearings-TaxExempt-Foundations-1953)




Regarding synthesis of the American and Soviet systems, Julian Huxley, the first director of UNESCO, called for the same thing in his book "UNESCO: It's Purpose and It's Philosophy" where he said:

"That [fundamental] task [of UNESCO] is to help the emergence of a single world culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of the entire human species. And it is necessary, for at the moment two opposing philosophies of life confront each other from the West and from the East, and not only impede the achievement of unity but threaten to become the foci of actual conflict.

You may categorise the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms; or as individualism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life; or as capitalism versus communism; or as Christianity versus Marxism; or in half a dozen other ways. The fact of their opposition remains and the further fact that round each of them are crystallising the lives and thoughts and political aspirations of hundreds of millions of human beings. Can this conflict be avoided, these opposites be reconciled, this antitheses be resolved in a higher syntheses? I believe not only that this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen - only I do not know whether it will happen before or after another war." (Julian Huxley, "UNESCO: It's Purpose and It's Philosophy", p. 61)

Keep in mind that this was from Julian Huxley, who was the first director of UNESCO and thus could most definitely be classified among the Power Elite. Keep in mind that the wars he is talking about were financed by the same people behind the Foundations, think tanks, and Round Table Groups we are discussing (see the collected works of Antony Sutton). Also keep in mind that Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley, was the president of the British Eugenics society, where he was an associate of the rabid Ultra-Eugenicist Charles Galton Darwin, who was the president of the British Eugenics Society after Huxley.

Also, the prominent Bolshevik Christian Rakovsky said in Red Symphony:

"Let us see if I shall not be able yet to help to understand . It is known that Marxism was called Hegelian . So this question was vulgarised . Hegelian idealism is a widespread adjustment' to an uninformed understanding in the West of the natural mysticism of Baruch Spinosa. "They" are spinosist: perhaps the matter is the other way round, i .e. that spinosism is "Them," insofar as he is only a version adequate to the epoch of "Their" own philosophy, which is a much earlier one, standing on a much higher level . After all, a hegelian and for that reason also thee follower of Spinosa was devoted to his faith, but only temporarily, tactically . The matter does not stand as is claimed by Marxism, that as the result of the elimination of contradictions there arises the synthesis . It is as the result of the opposing mutual fusion, from the thesis and anti-thesis that there arises, as a' synthesis, the reality, truth, as a final harmony between the subjective and objective . Do you not see that already? In Moscow there is Communism; in New York, Capitalism . It is all the same as a thesis and anti-thesis. Analyze both. Moscow is subjective Communism, but Capitalism -objective - State Capitalism. New York: Capitalism subjective, but Communism objective. A personal synthesis, truth: the Financial International, the Capitalist-Communist one. "They.""


Last edited by inquirer on Mon 30 Aug 2010, 6:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
incognito

incognito


Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyMon 30 Aug 2010, 12:38 am

FREAKING BRILLIANT!

Thanks, inquirer.
Back to top Go down
Ben Steigmann

Ben Steigmann


Posts : 114
Join date : 2010-05-21

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyMon 30 Aug 2010, 6:20 am

Thanks - you might like this also: http://www.revolutioninmilitaryaffairs.com/about/
Back to top Go down
offthepage

offthepage


Posts : 79
Join date : 2010-05-21

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyMon 30 Aug 2010, 3:07 pm

I think they did lie to Dodd, to cover up the extent of the conspiracy and its deep roots. They knew before the AHA/Carnegie reports that they would have to change education and they understood the sociological levels to pull, besides war. This stuff was nothing new. But they led Dodd to believe that is was new, in terms of turn of the 19th century stuff. But when I look back to Plato, I see evidence that they understood back then what changes were req'd to manipulate society. In the end, I do think they lied to Dodd, to minimize the extent of their knowledge, insight and plans.
Back to top Go down
Ben Steigmann

Ben Steigmann


Posts : 114
Join date : 2010-05-21

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyMon 30 Aug 2010, 4:27 pm



Plato-(Plotinus?)-Calvin-Bacon-Spinoza-Fitche-Hegel-Darwin-Marx-Wundt-Dewey-
Russell-(Skinner?)-???
Back to top Go down
C1
Admin
C1


Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyMon 30 Aug 2010, 8:51 pm

It's a long long list that we're supposed to cherish, honor, respect, and idolize. If only the public understood the real purpose of these "thought leaders".

Now, we're supposed to idolize Gates, Brin, Page, Zuckerberg, Jobs, etc. At least the front men of the past had brains and could think. This new crop of characters are literally messenger boys pumped-up by the media as something extraordinary.

_________________
"For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one striking at the root."
David Thoreau (1817-1862)
anonymously email me by clicking here
Back to top Go down
https://wwws.forummotion.com
incognito

incognito


Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyFri 17 Sep 2010, 6:52 am

A fab thread looking at the content and underlying motivations of the Dodd vid for sure. Thanks again Inquirer.

As many of you know I'm a warrior of un truth and false realities on Crackbook. I have been gently bringing someone around and he started talking about 'G'. I thought of the thread at RPFs on controlled opposition. You know the whole suppressed Dodd tape for 25ish years because he had no place to market it issue.

Here's FrankReps thread where IP brilliantly chimes in and destroys 'G'.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=195399&highlight=griffin
Back to top Go down
incognito

incognito


Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyFri 17 Sep 2010, 7:05 am

06-13-2009, 05:18 AM #29
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showpost.php?p=2165179&postcount=29

"Watch, I guarantee that JBS will be setup to be another target group soon. Just like the von Brunn OP targets "911 Truthers" and "Conspiracy Theorists" and "Anti Semites"... it won't be too long before they assemble an OP for a crazy JBS member to do something awful, then your entire "group" will be targeted. What a nice setup. And you'll fall for it every freaking time."

Nice call by the way, IP.
Back to top Go down
incognito

incognito


Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd EmptyFri 17 Sep 2010, 7:28 am

"There are some things you need to figure out for yourself for them to be believed and accepted (ie. to break through your own cognitive dissonance). No one can "show" you this. You need to start questions ALL of your assumptions and ALL of the limits to your thinking. The revelations will come quickly once you break through these chains". - IP

Classic.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Validating Norman Dodd Empty
PostSubject: Re: Validating Norman Dodd   Validating Norman Dodd Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Validating Norman Dodd
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Chapman on Dodd, 'G', Monteith, Mullins - Back in the Day

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWWS :: Main Forums :: Domestic Affairs-
Jump to: