Home  FAQ  Search  Memberlist  Usergroups  KDR  Register  Log in  

Share | 
 

 More Ft Hood Unreality

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2  Next
AuthorMessage
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 1:58 pm

I saw this yesterday and it made my head spin in a Linda Blair fashion.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules...ticle&sid=9315

Special Report: TERRORIST HASAN WAS BUSH HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISOR


FT. HOOD TERRORIST ON BUSH PRESTIGIOUS HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSITION TEAM

HASAN TIES TO GOP SUBJECT TO MASSIVE DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND COVERUP

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

"Lucy, you got some splainin' to do."

The task force at George Washington University designated with
establishing transitional procedures in the Global War on Terror
included Major Hasan, mass murder and terrorist, and, as we now learn,
long time terrorist suspect. Where do we start? Do we wonder why our
troops have a psychiatrist who is not only a potential terrorist but
known to be extremely mentally unbalanced? Who, in the Bush
Administration chose Hasan and helped him pass America's highest
security clearances?

Do any of us wonder why President Bush would have a terrorist helping
with his transitional policy? This put Hasan, under investigation for
ties to Al Qaeda, at the heart of our government's counter-terrorist
planning organization with full daily access to nearly all major
leaders in Homeland Security, Defense, the FBI, CIA, NSA and other key
agencies. He was one of them, along with representatives of
conservative "think tanks" that advised the Bush Administration on a
daily basis. Was he there because he reminded them of an Islamic
version of Dick Cheney? Please, someone, let's hear an explanation for
this.

Below is a cutout from the membership roster of those advising the Bush
Administration. You will note Hasan's name among some of the best known
security experts in America. We were told he was an Army psychiatrist
with severe psychological problems who belonged to a mosque run by
terrorists.



Hasan served with these individuals. Why was he here?

*
Richard V. Allen Former National Security Advisor
*
Stephen E. Flynn Ira A. Lipman Senior Fellow for Counterterrorism &
National Security Studies Council on Foreign Relations
*
Charles B. Curtis President & Chief Operating Officer Nuclear Threat Initiative
*
Judge William H.Webster Former Director of Central Intelligence and Former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
*
James Lee Witt Former Director Federal Emergency Management Agency
*
R. James Woolsey, Former Director Central Intelligence Agency
*
Edwin Meese, III Former U.S. Attorney General
*
General Edward "Shy" Meyer Former Chief of Staff U.S. Army
*
General Edward L. Rowny Former Ambassador and Lt. General USA (Ret.)
*
Judge William S. Sessions Former Director Federal Bureau of Investigation
*
Bobbie Greene Kilberg Member President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
*
E. Floyd Kvamme Former Co-Chair President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
*
Senator Connie Mack (R-FL) Former United States Senator, Florida
*
Secretary John O. Marsh, Jr. (D-VA) Former Secretary of the Army Former U.S. Congressman
*
and many others
*
Major Hasan was briefed by these individuals:
*
Michael Alexander, Majority Staff Director, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate
*
John Cohen, Senior Advisor, Office of the Program Manager for the
Information Sharing Environment , Office of the Director of National
Intelligence
*
Rosaline Cohen , Chief Counsel, Committee on Homeland Security, U.S. House of Representatives
*
Beth Grossman, Senior Counsel, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate
*
Alethea Long-Green, Program Area Director, National Academy of Public Administration
*
Mark Lowenthal, President and CEO of the Intelligence & Security
Academy, LLC, Former Assistant Director of Central Intelligence for
Analysis and Production
*
Monica Schoch-Spana, Senior Associate, Center for Biosecurity,
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and Assistant Professor
in the School of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases
*
Fran Townsend, Former Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism


The question we ask, is why was a simple low ranking military officer
with a disasterous career, horrible security baggage and a Palestinian
background placed at the center of the decision making apparatus of the
Bush presidency?

The entire text of the procedings report and full membership are listed
below. Hasan's name stands out like a rapper at a Klan rally. It
doesn't take a genius to believe that Hasan had friends in high places,
and that, despite every imaginable reason to see he shouldn't even
practice medicine, much less be in the American military or treat
troops suffering from combat stress, he was placed among the most
influential and powerful Americans.

One could suggest that, since Hasan was in town and had nothing to do
for the few months other than to work with thousands of patients
returning from Iraq and, in the process, mingle with terrorist
sympathizers and prove himself to be dangerously unstable and utterly
useless as a physician and psychiatrist, he might as well be included
in intelligence planning at the highest levels.

I can see where this could make sense to some, really, I do. After all,
if you were choosing the absolute last person on Earth to include in
such a group, the last person to expose to that much intelligence
planning and the most dangerous individual imaginable to the safety of
so many of our leaders, Hasan is a perfect choice.

Why did he choose to kill soldiers at Ft. Hood when so many of the top
members of the Bush Administration would have been available to him at
any time? If none of this makes any sense to you, I think you are
beginning to understand.

Who was Major Hasan? Who was he really?

SOME AREAS OF SPECULATION ABOUT MAJOR HASAN:

Hasan joined the Army at 18, entered and completed, not only college,
but medical school and a residency in psychiatry at Walter Reed
Hospital. This is an amazing accomplishment.

His attendance at the above mentioned meetings based on a careful
analysis of subject matter and the expertise level of everyone involved
made the likelihood of a junior officer specializing in combat stress
being invited unlikely. Hasan would have to have been an intelligence
asset of some kind.

Were this the case, as it most likely is, and taking into account that
at least some of the accusations made against him are other than part
of a coverup, Hasan was unstable. Stating this about a psychiatrist is
not much of a stretch.

His first targets were coworkers. Were Hasan cross trained in
intelligence and tasked with communicating with insurgents prior to
deployment, the stress could have been enormous. Hasan seems to have
responded to having to pretend to be a terrorist by actually becoming
one.

The more we read about his attendance at a 'terrorist Mosque" and
connections with Al Qaeda, the more likely our assumptions are the
correct ones. It is far more likely that a double agent would become
suicidally unbalanced than for a terrorist to, not only be promoted to
Major in the US Army, but to be put on a high security intelligence
transition team.

There may have been a time when the US Army believed Major Hasan would
be of enormous value to them in ways quite unrelated to practicing
medicine. The Major Hasan we now know is a terrorist. He may not always
have been so.

This evening, the Associated Press states:

"Investigators from the Fort Hood shootings say that Nidal Malik
Hasan acted alone and that no evidence supports the theory that Hasan
had outside help or orders about the massacre. Though in late 2008
Hasan did communicate with radical imam Anwar al-Awlaki, an
American-born Yemeni who now lives overseas and has ties to terrorist
groups, the messages "did not advocate violence or threaten violence."
Sources say that the communications were consistent with Hasan's
research as an Army psychologist on post-traumatic stress disorder. The
FBI has launched an investigation into how it handled, or perhaps
mishandled, the information it had on Hasan."

In a very few hours, the truth has danced like a marionette, across one
side of the stage to another. What can we expect? We will get an
endless supply of interim stories until a commission is appointed to
interview witnesses and come to a convenient conclusion that will best
serve political necessity. The same among us will be sickened by the
process.

VeteransToday Senior Editor Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and regular contributor on political and social issues.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
ScoutsHonor

avatar

Posts : 1360
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 6:23 pm

Very very interesting.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm

Where the heck are they taking us with this OP? Initially, I saw this
as the military's 9-11, which will result in all sorts of new
crackdowns inside the military. But why select a subject who can't
obviously be labeled as a pawn any longer, unless now they want to use
this OP so that the Obamabots can also slam conservatives?

Everyone is getting turned agains everyone else, which is why it is so critical for them to segment the public into discrete groups through vectoring.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 7:51 pm

Quote :
Keep in mind, Tarpley is a controlled asset too.

NIDAL MALIK HASAN OF VIRGINIA TECH, BETHESDA, AND
FORT HOOD: A MAJOR PATSY IN A DRILL GONE LIVE?

By Webster G. Tarpley
14 November 2009
http://actindependent.org/HasanPatsy.pdf

In the wake of the massacre at Fort Hood Texas, two principal theories have emerged to explain the conduct of the accused shooter, identified by the U.S. Army as Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist of Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry. One of these theories is embraced by left liberals and other supporters and acolytes of the Obama regime, and argues that Major Hasan is a sincere and devout Muslim who was the victim of a tragic contradiction between his religious faith and the logic of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, both the heritage of the odious Bush-Cheney regime. According to this version, Hasan must be viewed as a troubled and tormented individual who "snapped," breaking down psychologically under the stress of his awful predicament. Here is how Obama summed up this approach: “Even within the extraordinary military that we have – and I think everybody understands how outstanding the young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress – there are going to be instances in which an individual cracks.” (New York Times, 10 November 2009) Calling Major Hasan a terrorist amounts, in this view, to racism and vindictive prejudice.

The other theory is the one advocated by assorted neocons, reactionaries, Islamophobes and others generally hostile to Obama. This account maintains that Major Hasan was a homegrown, self-starting Islamic terrorist, trumpeting his devotion to jihad and suicide bombing, seeking to make contact with “Al Qaeda,” and generally filled with hate for America, for freedom, and for his fellow soldiers. In this view, it is only the pervasive political correctness and multicultural obsession of the subversive-riddled and soft-on terrorism Obama regime that prevented Major Hasan from being neutralized before he could act, and which prevents Obama and his Democratic allies from telling the truth after the fact.

These views are both superficial, naïve, and inadequate.1 They amount to two prongs of an articulated campaign of media hysteria and mass manipulation designed on the one hand to prod the dithering Wall Street puppet Obama – who is having second thoughts about his own political survival – into an early decision in favor of massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan for the purpose of hastening the breakup of Pakistan, and thus threatening China. On the other hand, the delirium of Islamophobic hatred being ginned up against Major Hasan by the usual cast of reactionary radio ogres (Limbaugh, Beck,
Hannity, Levin) seeks to accentuate and strengthen the racist and xenophobic elements in the militant anti-Obama opposition, in particular among the Tea Party movement. The decision to put the infamous Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his confreres on trial in New York City, plus the recent government seizure of numerous US mosques and other buildings on the grounds that they are Iranian assets, also contribute to a growing mood

continued at link above.
Tarpley is vectoring his audience, giving them a dialectical framework that they can chose from. But whatever you do, don't think out side this frame, at least that is the role Tarpley is playing here.


Last edited by IP on Mon 16 Nov 2009, 2:59 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
ScoutsHonor

avatar

Posts : 1360
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 8:59 pm

IP wrote:
Where the heck are they taking us with this OP? Initially, I saw this
as the military's 9-11, which will result in all sorts of new
crackdowns inside the military. But why select a subject who can't
obviously be labeled as a pawn any longer, unless now they want to use
this OP so that the Obamabots can also slam conservatives?

Everyone is getting turned agains everyone else, which is why it is so critical for them to segment the public into discrete groups through vectoring.

My head is spinning also. I suspect that Hasan is the target of this ultra convoluted plot; I suspect that he might well be the victim of mind-control, causing the "shooting spree"; these are all just gut suspicions. I DO NOT think he was a simple psychiatrist who "snapped"--psychiatrists don't just snap that easily, imo and he was very comfortable dealing with the stressed out soldiers he was treating, and I just don't buy that.

I think they want to eliminate him and I think he might turn up either unable to talk or dead (of something) very soon -- I don't think we will hear anymore from his own lips, so to speak. So, I guess I do think he is the patsy, something along the lines of the way McVeigh was a patsy while thinking he was actually on the inside, and in the know. Wheels within wheels, you know?

But I don't know WHY or what the reason was for targeting him, and I think we have to wait to see how they spin it, in order to know what their ultimate agenda was. That will tell us why, when we see the final fake reality/SPIN.

But right now, I'se Very very confused.
P.S. With the DARPA connection in his background, he may've been a long-term Manchurian candidate who was finally utilized...hmm, maybe.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 3:02 am

He was a patsy all along, they had a long range plan for this guy. Completely brainwashed by the very tech he was involved with. They used him, abused him then (almost) disposed of him with multiple shooters.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 3:12 am

ScoutsHonor wrote:
IP wrote:
Where the heck are they taking us with this OP? Initially, I saw this
as the military's 9-11, which will result in all sorts of new
crackdowns inside the military. But why select a subject who can't
obviously be labeled as a pawn any longer, unless now they want to use
this OP so that the Obamabots can also slam conservatives?

Everyone is getting turned agains everyone else, which is why it is so critical for them to segment the public into discrete groups through vectoring.

My head is spinning also. I suspect that Hasan is the target of this ultra convoluted plot; I suspect that he might well be the victim of mind-control, causing the "shooting spree"; these are all just gut suspicions. I DO NOT think he was a simple psychiatrist who "snapped"--psychiatrists don't just snap that easily, imo and he was very comfortable dealing with the stressed out soldiers he was treating, and I just don't buy that.

I think they want to eliminate him and I think he might turn up either unable to talk or dead (of something) very soon -- I don't think we will hear anymore from his own lips, so to speak. So, I guess I do think he is the patsy, something along the lines of the way McVeigh was a patsy while thinking he was actually on the inside, and in the know. Wheels within wheels, you know?

But I don't know WHY or what the reason was for targeting him, and I think we have to wait to see how they spin it, in order to know what their ultimate agenda was. That will tell us why, when we see the final fake reality/SPIN.

But right now, I'se Very very confused.
P.S. With the DARPA connection in his background, he may've been a long-term Manchurian candidate who was finally utilized...hmm, maybe.
Oh, this guy is most certainly a mind control operative. Did you know Hassan graduated from Virginia Tech?

I think keeping your head spinning right now is a good thing, that means that you are not accepting any of the vectors given to you to hold on to. This OP is going to take some real thought to figure out.

One thing I am certain of, they need to both destroy our military and also get our military to turn against America, and I would say that this aspect is part of this OP, although, it is certainly multifaceted.

I gotta read the rest of this Tarpley piece, it's 17pages .. ugh.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 3:24 am

I just pulled this from the 1st page of the Tarpley propaganda:

Quote :
These views are both superficial, naïve, and inadequate.1 They amount to two prongs of an articulated campaign of media hysteria and mass manipulation designed on the one hand to prod the dithering Wall Street puppet Obama – who is having second thoughts about his own political survival – into an early decision in favor of massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan for the purpose of hastening the breakup of Pakistan, and thus threatening China.

No one is trying to threaten China. The Elite already own China. Unless this is a setup for a fake China-West conflict so that China can ultimately take over as the new Miltary superpower.

Also, there is no war in Afghanistan, there is merely the world's poppy production that our Military is overseeing.

Finally, with regard to Obama "having second thoughts about his own political survival," I don't think Obama gets to make such decisions.

Quote :
On the other hand, the delirium of Islamophobic hatred being ginned up against Major Hasan by the usual cast of reactionary radio ogres (Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin) seeks to accentuate and strengthen the racist and xenophobic elements in the militant anti-Obama opposition, in particular among the Tea Party movement.
There are no racist and xenophobic elements within the Tea Party movement, that is all contrived by COINTEL operatives. I posted about that at RPF at the time, it was all contrived and staged.

These guys run all sides of these dialectics, then have their controlled "journalists" write stories about their COINTEL operations as if they are real, and then they makes decisions based upon this activity. The only problem is the public isn't involved in any of it. We're just bystanding to the entire show, every single aspect of it.

Quote :
The decision to put the infamous Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his confreres on trial in New York City, plus the recent government seizure of numerous US mosques and other buildings on the grounds that they are Iranian assets, also contribute to a growing mood of anti-Moslem hysteria
What growing mood of anti-Moslem hysteria? Where is it, I don't see it anywhere? Wherever I look in America, people seem to get along just find, not matter what their ethnicity, nationality, or color of their skin? I see no real evidence of this, except in the controlled extended media.

This Tarpley piece is built on so many lies it become almost impossible to dissect.


Last edited by IP on Mon 16 Nov 2009, 11:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 4:22 am

....and here Tarpley portrays Hassan as a misfit loner, a religious fanatic, and a quasi-psychotic. He claims that Hassan "could not subsist without protectors in high places of the US intelligence community."

On the other hand, didn't this guy just get promoted to the rank of Major not long ago? The US Army simply does NOT promote people to Major if they exhibit the sorts of traits Tarpley described.

While it is possible that Hassan had US intelligence "support," I am also wondering here if Tarpley is not helping to shape a false picture of Hassan that helps disguise the OP. For, if Hassan possesses NONE of these traits that Tarpley describes, then how is this OP explained? They must make Hassan look like a nut for any of these storylines to work, and Tarpley helps in its development.

Just think, what if Hassan is a normal military officer, who performed his duties at a high level and was a loyal officer of the US military. If that is the reality here, then how does one explain the shootings? Was Hassan a mind control victim while at Virgina Tech, and this lone gunman program was triggered in some way shortly before Veterans Day? Or, was this exercise carried out by a team and Hassan setup as a convenient Patsy? Or is it some other alternative we have not yet considered? If the public gets wind of some of these other vectors, it brings them much much closer to the Desert of the Real. I'll continue my reading of Tarpley to see if he raises this questions and gives the reader the clearing to think in this context.

Quote :
The media narrative which is now being consolidated a week after the shootings is full of contradictions, embarrassed silences, and absurdities. A third and distinct approach to this case is therefore required, one which regards Major Hasan as a manipulated patsy in the context of a relatively sophisticated operation mounted by forces within the US intelligence community, using methods and assets which by now ought to have become familiar. Major Hasan can be seen as a mixture of Lee Harvey Oswald, legendary 9/11 “suicide pilot” Mohammed Atta, and Cho Seung-Hui (the alleged April 2007 Virginia Tech shooter). He also has elements of reputed Robert Kennedy assassin Sirhan Sirhan, and of John Hinckley Jr., who was involved in an attempt to kill President Reagan – both of whom survived the operations in which they were implicated. He thus represents a new cocktail of patsy ingredients. Until now, Islamic terrorists had come in collectivist groups, and not alone. Major Hasan by contrast is a troubled loner in the tradition of Oswald, at the same time that he embodies the religious fanaticism of Atta, along with some of his peccadilloes. Major Hasan is that novelty, a troubled Islamic fundamentalist loner, even though this is something of a contradiction in terms. Like Cho, Major Hasan emerges from the psychiatric clinic, in his case as a practicing psychiatrist, but as a shrink with egregious symptoms of his own. Like all patsies, Major Hasan combines the flamboyant and bombastic proclamation of his personal creed with a seeming immunity from bureaucratic countermeasures which would normally be automatic in shutting him down. Hasan is revealed as a fanatic, a misfit, and a quasi-psychotic or psychotic mental case in his own right – who could not subsist without protectors in high places of the US intelligence community.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
LindyLady

avatar

Posts : 176
Join date : 2009-10-22

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 1:33 pm

If Hasan was a homeland security secret agent, then all his fanatic mulsim talk would have meant he was running a sting operation to draw out sympathetic military.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 5:59 pm

This is actually quite an interesting excerpt from Tarpley's piece, expanding on the role of the Patsy in a crime of this type. It makes me wonder if Hasan actually perpetrated any acts on the day of the shooting other than "act" Muslim.

Quote :
GEN. CONE BRINGS MAJOR HASAN BACK FROM THE DEAD AFTER 8 HOURS

It was only in the late evening that the official lone assassin version of these events was
assembled in another press conference by General Cone held about eight hours after the
shooting had started: “KILLEEN, Texas (KXAN/AP/MSNBC) - Twelve died and
another 31 were hurt in a mass shooting on Fort Hood that stunned the nation on
Thursday. Accused gunman Major Malik Nidal Hasan is alive and in stable condition, Lt.
Gen. Bob Cone said at a Thursday evening news conference just outside the storied
military post - the largest in the United States. Counter to initial reports, the 39-year-old
psychiatrist - who was thought to be killed by local police - is hospitalized and not
expected to die of multiple gunshots wounds sustained during the 1:30 p.m. attack. The
local police officer who allegedly shot Hasan and injured him is in the hospital also in
stable condition."

In the course of the day, we had thus gone from three shooters to only one. The separate
shooting incident at the Howze theater on the post reported earlier had also been
expunged in the process. Most remarkable of all was the ability of Major Hasan to come
back from the dead after eight hours in which the world had been assured of his demise.
Such resurrection is of course a physical impossibility for mere mortals. When
individuals are alleged to have performed deeds which are physically impossible in the
world as we know it, from Oswald's feats of shooting to Atta’s (and Hani Hjanjour’s)
feats of flying, we must become suspicious that intelligence agencies are assisting the
probable patsies in hidden ways. Major Hasan is said to have fired more than 100 rounds
using the two pistols he is alleged to have carried. This seems like a lot of shooting for a
single person surrounded by scores of trained combat veteran soldiers, even if these latter
had not been carrying their usual weapons.

The categorical imperative for every patsy is to get noticed, and to call attention to
himself or herself pointedly and repeatedly, by hook or by crook
. They must stand out so
much that they will be remembered by many ordinary people after the process of their
demonization has been launched. In order to fulfill their function, patsies must leave a
trail of clues and evidence which will tie themselves and the larger target group they
supposedly represent to the heinous actions they will shortly be accused of having
committed. Oswald handed out leaflets sympathetic to Cuba and told a television
audience that he was a Marxist. He went to the USSR, and tried to go to Cuba. Atta
cultivated a frightening stare, and took time to argue ostentatiously about a parking place
at an airport in Maine while he allegedly thought he was on his way to death. Major
Hasan seems to have some of the same strange proclivities. On the day of the shooting,
Major Hasan made sure there was no doubt about his religious loyalties by donning a
trademark “Islamic” white robe and skull cap to go to his local Seven-Eleven, where he
was sure to be filmed by the security cameras there
. This footage was then played on all
the networks for the next 48 hours. This gesture recalls the Koran Atta left in his car at
Boston’s Logan airport. When the FBI located Atta’s rented car, they found a copy of the
Koran, airline schedules, terrorist literature and videotapes, and Atta’s crudely forged last
will and testament in the luggage – all obviously and crudely left behind to make the
necessary point. Atta’s will betrayed the amateurish attempt of some half-baked area
specialist to sound Islamic.

At Fort Hood, Major Hasan ‘told a colleague, Col Terry Lee, that he believed Muslims
should rise up against American "aggressors."’
15 Count de Borchgrave points out that
Major Hasan had made at least one overtly ominous statement just before the shooting
spree: ‘As the Virginia-born major told a female neighbor in his apartment complex, "I'm
going to do good work for God."’16 The neighbor would not forget that grim pledge
anytime soon. Major Hasan was suspected of having authored internet postings that
compared suicide bombers with soldiers who throw themselves on hand grenades to save
others, although here we must be cautious, since these postings could have been made by
imposters. All accounts agree that witnesses heard a shout of “Allahu Akbar” just before
the firing started. Less clear is whether these words were spoken by Major Hasan. And if
he did say them, was this a line from the scenario script of a drill?

Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
LindyLady

avatar

Posts : 176
Join date : 2009-10-22

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 11:10 pm

This is a bit long, but I think RBN has taken the same template for the story that Tarpley used, and modified it for those on the right that believe in the clash of civilizations vector (Islam vs Christianity) and blame the left for everything.

The article was posted at 2 locations
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5264.shtml
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=5291

Check out some of the comments from RBN posters, which I will paste after the article.

Major Nidal Malik Hasan, jihadist or patsy?
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor
Nov 13, 2009, 00:28

The story as it unwinds seems too scripted to be true. That Army psychiatrist and Major Nidal M. Hasan went on a rampage at Fort Hood with two guns blazing, a .357 Magnum and a semi-automatic pistol with laser target-finder, after shouting the Arabic phrase ‘Allah Akbar’ (God is Greatest) as he opened fire, and will live (so far) to talk about it, though an Army-appointed lawyer says he will never get a fair trial.

Hasan coincidentally received his masters in chemistry at Virginia Tech, famous for the infamous Seung-Hui Cho, the campus killer gunman credited on April 19, 2007, with the deadliest shooting rampage in modern history. Seung-Hui’s sister curiously works for a State Department office that oversees billions of dollars in American aid for Iraq. See the link to Citizens for Legitimate Government on him and his ‘Missing Records.’ It’s more of the script, the association of Hasan with Seung-Hui.

Consider, too, that in 2007, Major Hasan, who received his medical degree in psychiatry from Walter Reed Hospital, spoke there, warning of threats within the ranks of Muslim Soldiers in a 50-slide Power-Point presentation, titled The Koranic World View As it Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military. “He stood before his supervisors and about 25 other mental health staff members and lectured on
Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting in the Muslim countries of Iraq and Afghanistan,”
reports the Nov.10 Washington Post, which includes Hasan’s entire presentation.

Hasan went so far as to say, “It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims.” How and why these words didn’t get his military superiors to question him seems beyond understanding, unless that, too, was part of the script. Could it be that they felt he was speaking the truth? But there was a more than veiled threat in the presentation, which you’ll see if you read it.

In fact, Hasan entered Walter Reed in 2003 and spent six years as an intern, resident and fellow. He was transferred to Fort Hood as a psychiatrist in July 2009 and was to leave soon for Afghanistan and had asked on numerous occasions not to be deployed. He even offered the U.S. government its money back for his Walter Reed education, every dollar of it. He did not want to fight fellow Muslims. Yet no one raised an eye? This is a U.S. Army major speaking, not some slacker from the sticks trying to dodge combat.

Of course, aside from his glaringly strong (if not correct) feelings against the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars, his supervisors found him quite competent counseling wounded PTSD soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. In the NY Times’ Details Emerge about Fort Hood suspect’s history, “Col. Kimberly Kesling, deputy commander of clinical services at Darnall Army Medical Center at Fort Hood, said she had known Hasan.

“‘You wouldn’t think that someone who works in your facility and provided excellent care for his patients, which he did, could do something like this,’ Kesling said. She described him as ‘a quiet man who wouldn’t seek the limelight’ and said she was shocked when she heard he was the suspect in the shootings.’” One can only imagine the tales he heard, which would only bolster his philosophical antipathy to the War on Terror, which he considered and claims to be a war on Islam, with which any number of Americans would agree.

This is all vaguely reminiscent of supposed communist-sympathizer Lee Harvey Oswald and his feelings for Cuba, which purportedly drove him towards a similar “lone gunman” assassination of President Kennedy, which today is amply questioned by millions of Americans who believe it involved the CIA, the Mob, the Defense Industry, and George H.W. Bush, Sr., among a number of the usual suspects.

Yet, an ABC News headline from Nov. 9 screams Officials: U.S. Army Told of Hasan Efforts to Contact al Qaeda: Army Major in Fort Hood Massacre Used ‘Electronic Means’ (the computer) to Connect with Terrorists: “U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was attempting to make contact with an individual associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News. According to the officials, the Army was informed of Hasan’s contact, but it is unclear what, if anything, the Army did in response.”

Why is it unclear, or is it just being withheld, or is there nothing of consequence to report, or is it a sheer lie?

This is coming from ABC News, which on every anniversary of JFK’s assassination, runs a “last word” piece on how it was committed by a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, the network being a long-standing CIA front. And
here, they have automatically established that the fabled ‘Al Qaeda,’ created,
funded, and branded by the CIA, was in contact with Major Hasan. So, what did
they do about it? Nothing! Read the balance of the article for the indignant ire of the politicians, so reminiscent of all the leads to the CIA and other presences in the JFK assassination, whose inquiry was led by Allan Dulles, the CIA head Kennedy fired for the creation of the Bay of Pigs’ invasion.

Of course, echoing ABC News is the New York Times with U.S.Knew of Suspect’s Tie to Radical Cleric. Aha, even more ties on the path to jihad, even more foreknowledge: “Intelligence agencies intercepted communications last year and this year between the military psychiatrist accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American teachings [itals mine].” And what did they do about it?

“But the federal authorities dropped an inquiry into the matter after deciding that the messages from the psychiatrist, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, did not suggest any threat of violence and concluding that no further action was warranted, government officials said Monday.” Oh, then why mention it in the first place? It goes on . . .

“Major Hasan’s 10 to 20 messages to Anwar al-Awlaki, once a spiritual leader at a mosque in suburban Virginia where Major Hasan worshiped, indicate that the troubled [now he’s nuts] military psychiatrist came to the attention of the authorities long before last Thursday’s shooting rampage at Fort Hood, but that the authorities left him in his post.” Why? Why? Why? Unless it’s all sheer BS.

Is this not reminiscent of 9/11 and the continued incompetence before, during and after it of various intelligence and government agencies, not to mention NORAD, the Pentagon, the executive branch? And nary a soul was fired after the terrible event.

All they could do was blame 19 head-shots of Muslims pulled out of a file by FBI Director Robert Mueller, who wouldn’t claim with complete surety their authenticity. And then the next step was declaring the War on Terror and preemptively, illegally, attacking Afghanistan, supposedly in search of (the Muslim goat) Osama bin Laden, who supposedly engineered it. Several years after 9/11, he was taken off the FBI’s Most Wanted list for the crime for lack of evidence to prove he was responsible for it. And then there was Iraq, claiming this time (the Muslim goat) Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and was about to use them any second, which was subsequently proven totally false.

So now Hasan is buried in Al Qaeda next to a radical cleric with strong anti-American teachings. Paydirt! The news networks have created a grid-like spider-web that holds its fly morsel, Hasan, to shame Islam. Does this not buttress the whole sagging “conspiracy theory” of the administration, particularly as more and more books, DVDs, architects, engineers, military men, pilots speak out against the flaws in the administration’s “9/11 conspiracy theory?” Does this not hit us over the head again with “a Muslim did it, remember 9/11?” Why was the intelligence at Fort Hood, the FBI, and CIA asleep at the wheel -- perhaps part of the script?

It also comes out in the same Times story linked above, “In 2000 and 2001, Mr. Awlaki [the radical cleric] served as an imam at two mosques in the United States frequented by three future Sept. 11 hijackers. Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended the Rabat mosque in San Diego, where Mr. Awlaki later admitted meeting Mr. Hazmi several times but ‘claimed not to remember any specifics of what they discussed,’ according to the report of the national Sept. 11 commission.” Uh huh, uh huh, we’re building to something here and . . .

“Both Mr. Hazmi and another hijacker, Hani Hanjour, later attended the Dar al Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Va., after Mr. Awlaki had moved there in early 2001. The Sept. 11 commission report expressed ‘suspicion’ about the coincidence, but said its investigators were unable to find Mr. Awlaki to question him.” Yes, but . . .

“Major Hasan attended the same Virginia mosque, but it is not known whether
they met there.” Hasan attended the same mosque, but it’s not known if he and
Hani, the idiot who couldn’t fly a Cessna, met there. But nevertheless we take
from this, if you’re political I.Q. isn’t below 40, the implication that Hasan was connected to the hijackers, because he’s a “nut killer terrorist,” too.

Yet who left him to do his killing but the very people in charge of his career. Or maybe someone in the backroom said, “Hands off Hasan. We have other plans for him. He’s in the bigger picture.” Ah, so much like Oswald, or David Chapman who shot John Lennon. Chapman then calmly sat down on the sidewalk after he did it, waiting for the police to come and take him. His handler, the doorman Jose Perdomo, went gone for the day, saying bye-bye to Chapman, as this Manchurian patsy went off to life imprisonment. And not in a mental hospital, but in a straight-up prison, which he “chose” to do, uh huh, uh huh.

And yet there’s more. Hasan supposedly wasn’t a lone gunman. No, he had three accomplices they say, one dead, and two in custody. Sort of makes sense. I mean to kill 13 people and wound 29 in a matter of minutes, supposedly thrusting a hundred rounds of ammo into the clips of his two pistols, Hasan would have to be John Wayne plus Superman. It would ruin the whole movie. But who are the accomplices? Well, there’s an account from CNN of the capture of one of them on a golf course two and a half miles away as 30 to 40 sirening cars full of MPs came to get him. Here is the short piece . . .

“(CNN) -- A senior officer who was playing golf Thursday near Fort Hood, Texas, told CNN he witnessed the arrest of one of the two surviving suspects of the shooting at the Army installation.

“Shortly after the shooting, the officer said, military police told him to clear the course and he saw other MPs surround the building that held the golf carts, he said.

The senior officer said he ducked into a nearby house for cover as 30 to 40 cars carrying MPs approached.

“He said he saw a soldier in battle-dress uniform, his hands in the air. The MPs ordered him to lie on the ground and open his uniform, presumably to ensure he was not carrying explosives, the senior officer said.” Presumably, they found no bomb.

“He said an MP told him that authorities considered the man to be a suspect in the shootings after having overheard the man say he was with the shooter. The man was surrounded for 25 to 30 minutes, until a convoy of vehicles arrived, led by a Ford Crown Victoria and carrying men in suits, and he was taken away, the senior officer said.” Sirening up to a suspect in 40 cars, wow, that’s stealth for you. And who was the man? And where is he now?

But they probably caught a few other suspects as well. I wonder if they’re all Muslims. And speaking of that, how do we jibe Hasan’s violent nature with Reuters’ article U.S. Army gunman’s act “impossible” – grandfather, who by the way lives on the West Bank in Palestine, where the Hasan family came from via Jordan to America.

“AL-BIREH, West Bank, Nov 7 (Reuters) - The grandfather of a U.S. Army psychiatrist accused of shooting dead 13 people and wounding 30 others at a base in Texas said on Saturday he found it impossible to believe his grandson had committed the act.

“’He is a doctor and loves the U.S.’ Ismail Mustafa Hamad told Reuters in an interview at his home in the Palestinian town of al-Bireh. ‘America made him what he is.’” Now, there’s a certain, deep irony to that statement.

The article concludes ”Hasan, who had spent years counseling wounded soldiers, many of whom had lost limbs fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, last visited him in the occupied West Bank some 10 years ago. Hamad said he had since visited his grandson in the United States. Hamad appeared to rule out a political motive.” Didn’t the poor old man know everything is political everywhere in this universe?

And so it goes, the contradictions, the lies, the suspected truth of what this orchestrated event means, and how it will bolster, supercharge resentment against Muslims once again and perpetuate our wars against their nations. And the folks who hold the puppet strings, will we be seeing them, hearing from them, or just listening to their news releases? Conflicting, accusatory, guilt in the highest from association, etc. All I can say is, “Good night, America, and good luck.”

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York
City. Reach him at
gvmaz@verizon.net. His new book, State Of
Shock: Poems from 9/11 on
” is available at
www.jerrymazza.com, Amazon or Barnesandnoble.com.
Copyright ©️ 1998-2007 Online Journal


Quote :
'Joe Green Says:
November 13th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

My personal opinion was that Major Hasan was a Jihadist and was put to this mission by Anti-american Imams.

The question I have to ask is: How do you tell who is a good Muslim, a bad Muslim(who would kill you and me if they get the chance) and a fellow traveler muslim?

Islam is not a religion, it’s a political movement using religion to meet it’s goals. Take over the World!"

Quote :
"Ronald Jones Says:
November 15th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

Obama, and all those whining, panty waisted, pathetic Maggots, it’s time for a little refresher course on exactly why we have to fight for our very lives and our way of life.."


Last edited by Ronne on Mon 16 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Silent Wind



Posts : 261
Join date : 2009-10-24

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Mon 16 Nov 2009, 11:15 pm

Very very deep and interesting. Its a damn shame too many who claim to be awake cant see it all for what it is, a spiders web so deep and nasty that one cant fully imagine the vileness of it all.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
C1
Admin
avatar

Posts : 1611
Join date : 2009-10-19

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Tue 17 Nov 2009, 1:59 am

stilltrying wrote:
Very very deep and interesting. Its a damn shame
too many who claim to be awake cant see it all for what it is, a
spiders web so deep and nasty that one cant fully imagine the vileness
of it all
.
This OP is so complex and is so multifaceted and multilayered that is does blow ones mind. It does get very challenging to call-out all of the vectoring, who the vectoring is targeted at, and why. But I hope that by at least scratching the surface, we'll be better prepared to understand how they will take various audience segments in the future and manipulate them, based upon the memes established in this OP. But yes, it is very disconcerting to see others dismiss any relevant & indepth discussion of such matters... as it really shows their total immersion in the simulacrum.

But this is reminding me more and more of the movie Brazil (1985 spoof on our Simulacra) and the Department of In-Formation Dispersal, which distributes constant simulacra about terrorists. Here's a clip from the beginning of the movie displaying the terror meme.



Ronne wrote:
This is a bit long, but I think RBN has taken the same template for the story that Tarpley used, and modified it for those on the right that believe in the clash of civilizations vector (Islam vs Christianity) and blame the left for everything.

I think this is a very good find... an example of how they take the same core story and manipulate it for each of the audience segments within the political spectrum (we're talking about the spectrum referred to in Full Spectrum Dominance), keeping each segment inside its own unique simulacrum.

I've picked out some segments from this story that you found, and will briefly comment on each below....

Quote :
Hasan went so far as to say, “It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims.” How and why these words didn’t get his military superiors to question him seems beyond understanding, unless that, too, was part of the script. Could it be that they felt he was speaking the truth? But there was a more than veiled threat in the presentation, which you’ll see if you read it.
So, this sounds very much like the James Cameron's AVATAR movie that I brought up in another thread, which is about to be released, and depicts a US Marine who infiltrates an Alien enemy, and then, after living with them, sympathizes with their plight and turns against the US Military.

As I said earlier in this thread, this appears to be the US Military's 911. Now, we're going to a crackdown inside the services, with Military service members unaware of whether they can trust the person sleeping in the bunk next to them. This will decimate the trust and bonds that are critical for a functional military, and could be the start of the military turning against its own population, or at least segments of it that it is convinced are the enemy.

Quote :
“‘You wouldn’t think that someone who works in your facility and provided excellent care for his patients, which he did, could do something like this,’ Kesling said. She described him as ‘a quiet man who wouldn’t seek the limelight’ and said she was shocked when she heard he was the suspect in the shootings.’” One can only imagine the tales he heard, which would only bolster his philosophical antipathy to the War on Terror, which he considered and claims to be a war on Islam, with which any number of Americans would agree.

This is all vaguely reminiscent of supposed communist-sympathizer Lee Harvey Oswald and his feelings for Cuba, which purportedly drove him towards a similar “lone gunman” assassination of President Kennedy, which today is amply questioned by millions of Americans who believe it involved the CIA, the Mob, the Defense Industry, and George H.W. Bush, Sr., among a number of the usual suspects.
That is the genre of the Hasan OP.... the 'traitor in our midst' meme, which was, in part, the same as Oswald. The moral of the story - 'don't suspect your coworker - report suspicious behavior'. This is part of Soros' "Open Society," where every aspect of you and your life is searchable online and people who find something out about you can report you to the "authorities." This has now come to the US Military as well.

Quote :
Yet, an ABC News headline from Nov. 9 screams Officials: U.S. Army Told of Hasan Efforts to Contact al Qaeda: Army Major in Fort Hood Massacre Used ‘Electronic Means’ (the computer) to Connect with Terrorists: “U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was attempting to make contact with an individual associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News. According to the officials, the Army was informed of Hasan’s contact, but it is unclear what, if anything, the Army did in response.”
So, they make sure to include in the story some aspect of Internet
useage, which provides them with justification for tighter controls on
Internet useage in the US Military.

Quote :
“Major Hasan’s 10 to 20 messages to Anwar al-Awlaki, once a spiritual leader at a mosque in suburban Virginia where Major Hasan worshiped, indicate that the troubled [now he’s nuts] military psychiatrist came to the attention of the authorities long before last Thursday’s shooting rampage at Fort Hood, but that the authorities left him in his post.” Why? Why? Why? Unless it’s all sheer BS.

Is this not reminiscent of 9/11 and the continued incompetence before, during and after it of various intelligence and government agencies, not to mention NORAD, the Pentagon, the executive branch? And nary a soul was fired after the terrible event.
So once again we have incompent authorities making poor decision. My guess is this will be used as justification to create a super-institution, like Homeland Security, will combine many different smaller institutions in order to consolidate power over monitoring of Military operations. My thoughts here are that they are increasing the granularity of control over the Military in case anyone inside the Military decides that a coup of this occupying government is in order.


Quote :
“Major Hasan attended the same Virginia mosque, but it is not known whether they met there.” Hasan attended the same mosque, but it’s not known if he and Hani, the idiot who couldn’t fly a Cessna, met there. But nevertheless we take from this, if you’re political I.Q. isn’t below 40, the implication that Hasan was connected to the hijackers, because he’s a “nut killer terrorist,” too.
Interesting that they are attempting to tie Hasan to a 911 operative. I guess that is to make sure that the right-wing Islamic haters tie Hasan to 911, so that can futher demonize his image in order to justify more hostilities toward Islam.

Quote :
Yet who left him to do his killing but the very people in charge of his career. Or maybe someone in the backroom said, “Hands off Hasan. We have other plans for him. He’s in the bigger picture.”
Again, the people running the Military can no longer be trusted. We must create new institutions to protect ourselves from potential Islamic traitors.

Quote :
“’He is a doctor and loves the U.S.’ Ismail Mustafa Haad told Reuters in an interview at his home in the Palestinian town of al-Bireh. ‘America made him what he is.’” Now, there’s a certain, deep irony to that statement.
So, America made Hasan a successful Military doctor and a Terrorist.. that is what Hasan's father is supposedly saying here. Wow, what a way to piss-off right-wingers... as they will most likely argue that they paid for Hasan's education only to have him turn on America. The end result, this meme will create more division and hatred between right-wing joe-blows and Islam.

Quote :
And so it goes, the contradictions, the lies, the suspected truth of what this orchestrated event means, and how it will bolster, supercharge resentment against Muslims once again and perpetuate our wars against their nations. And the folks who hold the puppet strings, will we be seeing them, hearing from them, or just listening to their news releases? Conflicting, accusatory, guilt in the highest from association, etc. All I can say is, “Good night, America, and good luck.”
So, if you're reading this article and you haven't figured it out yet, the author is telling the intended audience that this will "bolster... resentment against Muslims." This is predictive programming for the intended audience.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://wwws.forummotion.com
matterik

avatar

Posts : 10
Join date : 2009-11-03
Location : Sweden

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Tue 24 Nov 2009, 4:20 pm

I dont think they give a dam anymore what the public thinks. Personally I dont check the media anymore. I see the entire media as a sorcerer, an entity, interested in controlling consciousness. I believe it is also. They know that the ultimate aim for them is to control the minds. This is what they are up to. They bombard us with facts and fiction, information overload, they give us fear and open corruption, soup operas and intrigue. The media, all it ever wants, is our attention. It is just like hollywood, which is another branch of the same media that controlls the news agencies.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://matterik.com
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Tue 24 Nov 2009, 11:29 pm

Here's a piece from the fringe, making the most sense of them all. The author compares Hasan to the lead 9/11 hijacker and makes a connection with Virginia Tech.

source

Major Hasan of Fort Hood: A Patsy In A Drill Gone Live?


PAK TRIBUNE

In
the wake of the massacre at Fort Hood Texas , two principal theories
have emerged to explain the conduct of the accused shooter, identified
by the U.S. Army as Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist of
Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry. One of these theories is embraced by
left liberals and other supporters and acolytes of the Obama regime,
and argues that Major Hasan is a sincere and devout Muslim who was the
victim of a tragic contradiction between his religious faith and the
logic of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, both the heritage of the odious
Bush-Cheney regime. According to this version, Hasan must be viewed as
a troubled and tormented individual who “snapped,” breaking down
psychologically under the stress of his awful predicament. Here is how
Obama summed up this approach: “Even within the extraordinary military
that we have — and I think everybody understands how outstanding the
young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress — there
are going to be instances in which an individual cracks.” (New York
Times, 10 Nov and ember 2009) Calling Major Hasan a terrorist amounts,
in this view, to racism and vindictive prejudice.

The other
theory is the one advocated by assorted neocons, reactionaries,
Islamophobes and others generally hostile to Obama. This account
maintains that Major Hasan was a homegrown, self-starting Islamic
terrorist, trumpeting his devotion to jihad and suicide bombing,
seeking to make contact with “Al Qaeda,” and generally filled with hate
for America , for freedom, and for his fellow soldiers. In this view,
it is only the pervasive political correctness and multicultural
obsession of the subversive-riddled and soft on terrorism Obama regime
that prevented Major Hasan from being neutralized before he could act,
and which prevents Obama and his Democratic allies from telling the
truth after the fact.

These views are both superficial, naïve,
and inadequate.[1] They amount to two prongs of an articulated campaign
of media hysteria and mass manipulation designed on the one hand to
prod the dithering Wall Street puppet Obama ­ who is having second
thoughts about his own political survival — into an early decision in
favor of massive escalation of the war in Afghanistan for the purpose
of hastening the breakup of Pakistan, and thus threatening China. On
the other hand, the delirium of Islamophobic hatred being ginned up
against Major Hasan by the usual cast of reactionary radio ogres
(Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin) seeks to accentuate and strengthen the
racist and xenophobic elements in the militant anti-Obama opposition,
in particular among the Tea Party movement. The decision to put the
infamous Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his confreres on trail in New York
City, plus the recent government seizure of numerous US mosques and
other buildings on the grounds that they are Iranian assets, also
contribute to a growing mood of anti-Moslem hysteria. This atmosphere
is accentuated by the reckless and irresponsible actions of some Moslem
groups which happen to be foundation-funded, and must thus be
considered as part of the apparatus of US domestic social control.

The
media narrative which is now being consolidated a week after the
shootings is full of contradictions, embarrassed silences, and
absurdities. A third and distinct approach to this case is therefore
required, one which regards Major Hasan as a manipulated patsy in the
context of a relatively sophisticated operation mounted by forces
within the US intelligence community, using methods and assets which by
now ought to have become familiar. Major Hasan can be seen as a mixture
of Lee Harvey Oswald, legendary 9/11 “suicide pilot” Mohammed Atta, and
Cho Seung-Hui (the alleged April 2007 Virginia Tech shooter). He also
has elements of reputed Robert Kennedy assassin Sirhan Sirhan, and of
John Hinckley Jr., who was involved in an attempt to kill President
Reagan ­ both of whom survived the operations in which they were
implicated. He thus represents a new cocktail of patsy ingredients.
Until now, Islamic terrorists had come in collectivist groups, and not
alone. Major Hasan by contrast is a troubled loner in the tradition of
Oswald, at the same time that he embodies the religious fanaticism of
Atta, along with some of his peccadilloes. Major Hasan is that novelty,
a troubled Islamic fundamentalist loner, even though this is something
of a contradiction in terms. Like Cho, Major Hasan emerges from the
psychiatric clinic, in his case as a practicing psychiatrist, but as a
shrink with egregious symptoms of his own. Like all patsies, Major
Hasan combines the flamboyant and bombastic proclamation of his
personal creed with a seeming immunity from bureaucratic
countermeasures which would normally be automatic in shutting him down.
Hasan is revealed as a fanatic, a misfit, and a quasi-psychotic or
psychotic mental case in his own right ­ who could not subsist without
protectors in high places of the US intelligence community.

In
my 2005 book 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism, I argued that 9/11 and other
recent terrorist attacks represented provocations cynically
orchestrated by privately controlled rogue networks operating within
the US intelligence agencies for purposes of mass political
manipulation. Starting from an overview of terrorist actions from the
Gunpowder Plot of 1605 through 9/11, I developed a method of analysis
of state-sponsored false flag terrorism which distinguished the roles
of fanatical, duped, or psychotic patsies like Oswald, of subversive
moles ensconced as officials within government agencies, and of
technicians or professional killers who actually create the observed
effects, all commanded and coordinated from outside of government, and
all operating within the atmosphere of mass brainwashing provided by
the Wall Street media. I also highlighted the role of drills and
exercises which are hijacked and turned into real-world terror attacks.
In order to understand the Fort Hood massacre, it is indispensable to
apply this method here as well.

TROOPS THOUGHT IT WAS A DRILL ­ DID MAJOR HASAN THINK SO TOO?

In
investigations like this, it is generally a great mistake to fixate on
the scapegoat dished up by the mass media. The more we focus on the
Oswald of the day, the less we understand of what actually happened.
Let us turn away from the TV pundits, and listen instead to the
eyewitness testimony of the troops who were present at the shootings.
Many of them are on record agreeing that the events of November 5 were
initially interpreted by those on the scene as an exercise, as a drill.
Emphasis will be added to bring out this central fact.

From ABC
News we get the following testimony: Solider Keara Bono ‘told “Good
Morning America” today that she initially thought the scene of Hasan
standing up, praising Allah and starting to fire was a drill. She
didn’t believe it was real even when she felt her own blood, she said.
“Then I looked to my left and right and I saw people that were
bleeding,” she said. That’s when Bono realized that Hasan’s rampage
wasn’t a drill.’ (ABC News GMA)[2]

In the Milwaukee Journal
Sentinel of 9 November 2009 we find: “Pfc. Amber Bahr of Random Lake [
Wisconsin ] heard someone yelling and ducked at the sound of gunfire,
but she said she thought supervisors at Fort Hood were holding a drill
last Thursday. She didn’t know she was under live fire until she heard
people screaming.”[3] This story was based on an interview given to
NBC’s Today show.

CBS News reported: “Two days after narrowly
escaping death at Fort Hood and just hours after his release from the
hospital, Corporal Nathan Hewitt still can’t believe what happened was
real. The survivor spoke to CBS News Correspondent Don Teague about
those fateful minutes. Even after being shot, Hewitt didn’t believe
what was happening. He thought the gunfire was a training exercise and
that he’d been hit by a rubber bullet. He says other victims thought
the same thing.”[4]

ABC newsman Bob Woodruff found further
corroboration of this general impression when he was allowed to
interview shooting victims who were recovering in the hospital: “For
many of the 43 people wounded when an Army psychiatrist allegedly went
on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, the scene was unreal — it seemed
like something out of a movie. Maybe it was a drill. .Capt. Dorrie
Carskadon, a combat stress specialist from Wisconsin , who was at Fort
Hood training for a deployment to Afghanistan , said she initially
thought the shooting was a drill.”[5] Notice that this testimony comes
from a field grade officer, a captain.

The Austin television
station KXAN provides the following evidence: ‘Spc. Scott Hamrick and
First Sergeant James McLeod made it out of the Soldier Readiness
Processing Center alive after some maneuvering to get away from the
suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. “My initial thought is that it was a
drill,” said Hamrick. “Because you know you’re always getting drilled
for situations.” However, what Hamrick thought was a drill turned out
to be something closer to war at home.’[6]

The Miami Herald
furnished this account: ‘For Skip Blancett, the senior pastor at the
First United Methodist Church of Killeen, news of the shooting left him
anguishing for hours because his daughter, Hollye Davis, was at a
building next door to where the gunman started firing. She and others
were in lockdown for hours. Without a cellphone, she couldn’t call
home. “They had no idea what was going on; everyone thought it was a
drill at first,” Blancett said.’[7]

The idea that the shooting
was part of a drill or exercise was so widespread that it had to be
expressly countered in the first emergency announcement posted on the
Fort Hood web site, which read: “Effective immediately. Fort Hood is
closed. Organizations/units are instructed to execute a 100 per cent
accountability of all personnel. This is not a drill. It is an
emergency situation.”[8]

Based on this testimony, it seems clear
that unannounced, surprise terror drills are standard operating
procedure at Fort Hood and probably other military bases as well. They
are frequent enough to be the first thing many soldiers, including at
least one officer, thought was happening. Drills are designed to be as
realistic as possible. But the acme of realism is reality ­ real
killing, which can occur through small but decisive changes in the
unfolding of the drill. We may therefore be dealing here with a drill
which has been taken live or flipped live, as so often happens in
terror incidents.[9]

This array of evidence allows us to pose
the following question: If so many of the Army personnel on the scene
thought at first that the incident was a drill, did Major Hasan also
think he was attending a drill? Did he imagine that he was going to be
an actor playing the assigned role of a member of the terrorist red
team in a realistic exercise? In other words, was this inept, troubled
and quasi-psychotic individual somehow under the impression that he was
attending an officially sanctioned exercise of some routine type, until
real bullets began to be fired by other more qualified shooters, thus
taking the drill live? This might also help us to account for the
extraordinary intensity of firing at the scene ­ well over 100 rounds.
For this working hypothesis to stand up, we would have to show that
there were other gunmen firing ­ gunmen who knew that the drill was
turning into a real massacre. The additional shooters would according
to the classification referred to above represent the technicians in
this action ­ the trained killers who have the ability to do the things
that the patsy is accused of doing. Interestingly enough, extra gunmen
are exactly what we find.

ONE SHOOTER, OR THREE?

How many
shooters were there? Early reports indicated that there were at least
one, and perhaps two, in addition to Major Hasan. Dow Jones newswires
reported at about 5 PM Eastern Time: “A second gunman is in custody
after a shooting at the Army’s Fort Hood in Texas in which at least
seven people were killed and 12 wounded, reports KCEN-TV of Waco. The
report comes about two hours after a first suspect was captured,
shortly after gunfire broke out.”[10] According to the Dow Jones report
cited, shooting had occurred in two separate locations on the Fort Hood
base: “The incident reportedly began at Fort Hood ’s theater and then
moved to the Soldier Readiness Processing Center , Killeen City Public
Information Officer Hillary Shine told Fox News.” According to an AP
wire, these facts were also announced by an official Army spokesman at
the base: “The spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Nathan Banks, says two
shooters were apparently involved. There is no word yet on who they
were, nor on identities of the dead. Banks says the second incident
took place at a theater on the sprawling base.” [11] Many of the
embarrassing reports about multiple shooters have been purged after the
fact from websites, but a few have survived, as in the case of this
Wisconsin radio station, where we read that the triple assassin theory
had been embraced by the commander of the base: “Newsradio 620 WTMJ:
Lt. General Bob Cone at Fort Hood confirms 12 dead, 31 hurt in
shooting. Soldier gunman killed. 2 others in custody.”[12] During the
later afternoon, cable television talked of three shooters, and in the
London Daily Mirror account we find: “Twelve people were killed and 31
wounded when three gunmen in uniform opened fire at the US Army’s
largest armoured base in Texas yesterday. One gunman was shot by
civilian police and the two others held at Fort Hood .”[13]

GEN. CONE BRINGS MAJOR HASAN BACK FROM THE DEAD AFTER 8 HOURS

It
was only in the late evening that the official lone assassin version of
these events was assembled in another press conference by General Cone
held about eight hours after the shooting had started: ” KILLEEN ,
Texas (KXAN/AP/MSNBC) – Twelve died and another 31 were hurt in a mass
shooting on Fort Hood that stunned the nation on Thursday. Accused
gunman Major Malik Nidal Hasan is alive and in stable condition, Lt.
Gen. Bob Cone said at a Thursday evening news conference just outside
the storied military post – the largest in the United States . Counter
to initial reports, the 39-year-old psychiatrist – who was thought to
be killed by local police – is hospitalized and not expected to die of
multiple gunshots wounds sustained during the 1:30 p.m. attack. The
local police officer who allegedly shot Hasan and injured him is in the
hospital also in stable condition.”[14]

In the course of the
day, we had thus gone from three shooters to only one. The separate
shooting incident at the Howze theater on the post reported earlier had
also been expunged in the process. Most remarkable of all was the
ability of Major Hasan to come back from the dead after eight hours in
which the world had been assured of his demise. Such resurrection is of
course a physical impossibility for mere mortals. When individuals are
alleged to have performed deeds which are physically impossible in the
world as we know it, from Oswald’s feats of shooting to Atta’s (and
Hani Hjanjour’s) feats of flying, we must become suspicious that
intelligence agencies are assisting the probable patsies in hidden
ways. Major Hasan is said to have fired more than 100 rounds using the
two pistols he is alleged to have carried. This seems like a lot of
shooting for a single person surrounded by scores of trained combat
veteran soldiers, even if these latter had not been carrying their
usual weapons.

The categorical imperative for every patsy is to
get noticed, and to call attention to himself or herself pointedly and
repeatedly, by hook or by crook. They must stand out so much that they
will be remembered by many ordinary people after the process of their
demonization has been launched. In order to fulfill their function,
patsies must leave a trail of clues and evidence which will tie
themselves and the larger target group they supposedly represent to the
heinous actions they will shortly be accused of having committed.
Oswald handed out leaflets sympathetic to Cuba and told a television
audience that he was a Marxist. He went to the USSR, and tried to go to
Cuba. Atta cultivated a frightening stare, and took time to argue
ostentatiously about a parking place at an airport in Maine while he
allegedly thought he was on his way to death. Major Hasan seems to have
some of the same strange proclivities. On the day of the shooting,
Major Hasan made sure there was no doubt about his religious loyalties
by donning a trademark “Islamic” white robe and skull cap to go to his
local Seven-Eleven, where he was sure to be filmed by the security
cameras there. This footage was then played on all the networks for the
next 48 hours. This gesture recalls the Koran Atta left in his car at
Boston ’s Logan airport. When the FBI located Atta’s rented car, they
found a copy of the Koran, airline schedules, terrorist literature and
videotapes, and Atta’s crudely forged last will and testament in the
luggage ­ all obviously and crudely left behind to make the necessary
point. Atta’s will betrayed the amateurish attempt of some half-baked
area specialist to sound Islamic

At Fort Hood , Major Hasan
‘told a colleague, Col Terry Lee, that he believed Muslims should rise
up against American “aggressors.”‘ [15] Count de Borchgrave points out
that Major Hasan had made at least one overtly ominous statement just
before the shooting spree: ‘As the Virginia-born major told a female
neighbor in his apartment complex, “I’m going to do good work for
God.”‘[16] The neighbor would not forget that grim pledge anytime soon.
Major Hasan was suspected of having authored internet postings that
compared suicide bombers with soldiers who throw themselves on hand
grenades to save others, although here we must be cautious, since these
postings could have been made by imposters. All accounts agree that
witnesses heard a shout of “Allahu Akbar” just before the firing
started. Less clear is whether these words were spoken by Major Hasan.
And if he did say them, was this a line from the scenario script of a
drill?

MAJOR HASAN’S RANT TO MILITARY DOCTORS: “WE LOVE DEATH MORE THAN YOU LOVE LIFE”

The
most elaborate attempts by Major Hasan to assert and establish a
thoroughly Islamic profile for himself came in the form of a lecture at
the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda ,
Maryland . He was supposed to present a paper on an issue of medical or
clinical interest, but instead elected to make a ranting speech about
the oppression of Moslems in the US military and the dangerous
consequences this was sure to have. Here are some relevant parts of the
account published by Dana Priest in the Washington Post: ‘The Army
psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood warned a
roomful of senior Army physicians a year and a half ago that to avoid
“adverse events,” the military should allow Muslim soldiers to be
released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against
other Muslims. The title of Hasan’s PowerPoint presentation was “The
Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.”
Under a slide titled “Comments,” he wrote: “If Muslim groups can
convince Muslims that they are fighting for God against injustices of
the ‘infidels’; ie: enemies of Islam, then Muslims can become a potent
adversary ie: suicide bombing, etc.” [sic] The last bullet point on
that page reads simply: “We love death more then [sic] you love life!”
Under the “Conclusions” page, Hasan wrote that “Fighting to establish
an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the
Islam,” and that “Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that
renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will
vary!” The final page, labeled “Recommendation,” contained only one
suggestion: “Department of Defense should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers
the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase
troop morale and decrease adverse events.”‘[17]

Objections were
made to Major Hasan’s tirade: “Students on a 2007-2008 master’s
programme at a military college revealed that they had complained to
faculty about Major Hasan’s alleged anti-American views. They included
him giving a presentation that justified suicide bombing and telling
classmates that Islamic law trumped the US Constitution.”[18] But
nothing serious happened. According to National Public Radio’s Joseph
Shapiro, the worst thing that happened was that Hasan was given a
period of probation early in his postgraduate work because of his
insistence on seeking to convert to Islam some coworkers and the
soldiers he was treating.

The title of this speech, “The Koranic
World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military,” sounds very
academic and not very Islamic at all. It seems to imply that Islam and
the Koran are just a world view or Weltanschauung among others. It
falls far short of the basic Islamic fundamentalist claim to represent
the authority of absolute revealed truth. We are reminded of Mohamed
Atta’s will and instructions for his own funeral, which Islamic experts
have found to be replete with elements and formulations utterly alien
to Islam.

The categorical imperative for every mole is to
protect the relevant patsies from investigation or arrest until the
terror event has occurred and it is time to round the patsies up as
scapegoats. The part about “We love death more then [sic] you love
life!” is blatant ID format “Al Qaeda” speak, and in a military setting
this speech would normally be more than enough to trigger a probing
investigation into Major Hasan’s activities and belief structure. But
no serious consequences ensued, suggesting that Major Hasan was an
asset who was being protected for the sake of some future mission which
he was being groomed and prepared to perform.

Thus, while
Hasan’s medical superiors were aware of him as a problem case, they
chose to do nothing: a ” group of doctors overseeing Nidal Malik
Hasan’s medical training discussed concerns about his overly zealous
religious views and strange behavior months before the Army major was
accused of opening fire on soldiers and civilians at Fort Hood , Texas
. Doctors and staff overseeing Hasan’s training viewed him at times as
belligerent, defensive and argumentative in his frequent discussions of
his Muslim faith, a military official familiar with several group
discussions about Hasan said. As a psychiatrist in training, Hasan was
characterized in meetings as a mediocre student and lazy worker, a
matter of concern among the doctors and staff at Walter Reed Army
Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences military medical school, the official said.” (AP, 11 November
2009 )[19] At the same time, the training of a psychiatrist involves
intensive psychological profiling an depth analysis by professors as an
integral part of the training. As a shrink among shrinks, Major Hasan’s
psychology must have been well known to the military doctors who were
his professors. This opens up an avenue for manipulating and
controlling him which has not been present in other terrorism cases.
Did one or more of the Major Hasan’s analysts have a sideline as
terrorist controllers and mind benders working for the rogue network?

WALTER REED OFFICIALS ASKED: “WAS HASAN PSYCHOTIC?”

A
more explicit and illuminating version of Major Hasan’s psychiatric
review comes from National Public Radio. Here we find that he was
variously evaluated as “disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and
schizoid.” This raised the problem of whether he was actually psychotic
and thus suffering from severe mental illness: ‘Starting in the spring
of 2008, key officials from Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences held a series of
meetings and conversations, in part about Maj. Nidal Hasan.One of the
questions they pondered: Was Hasan psychotic? Both fellow students and
faculty were deeply troubled by Hasan’s behavior – which they variously
called disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and schizoid. The
officials say he antagonized some students and faculty by espousing
what they perceived to be extremist Islamic views. His supervisors at
Walter Reed had even reprimanded him for telling at least one patient
that “Islam can save your soul.” Hasan spent six years as a
psychiatrist at Walter Reed, beginning in 2003, and he had a fellowship
at USUHS until shortly before he went to Fort Hood in the summer of
2009. A committee of officials from both places regularly meets once a
month to discuss pressing topics surrounding the psychiatrists and
other mental health professionals who train and work at the
institutions. Participants in the spring meeting and in subsequent
conversations about Hasan reportedly included John Bradley, chief of
psychiatry at Walter Reed; Robert Ursano, chairman of the Psychiatry
Department at USUHS; Charles Engel, assistant chair of the Psychiatry
Department and director of Hasan’s psychiatry fellowship; Dr. David
Benedek, another assistant chairman of psychiatry at USUHS;
psychiatrist Carroll J. Diebold; and Scott Moran, director of the
psychiatric residency program at Walter Reed, according to colleagues
and other sources who monitor the meetings.’[20] Why did this august
panel not take any practical steps in regard to Major Hasan? This
account blames bureaucratic inertia and political correctness founded
on the fear of seeming to discriminate against Moslems. But these
reasons need to be supplemented with another possibility: that a
witting mole (or moles) was shielding Major Hasan from any sanctions so
he could go on to greater things as a witting or unwitting agent
provocateur and patsy.

One comment included in this NPR account
was especially ominous: “Another official reportedly wondered aloud to
colleagues whether Hasan might be capable of committing fratricide,
like the Muslim U.S. Army sergeant who, in 2003, killed two fellow
soldiers and injured 14 others by setting off grenades at a base in
Kuwait .” Despite such real and present dangers, nothing was done.

MAJOR HASAN’S MOSQUE LINKED TO THE CIA’S CHECHEN TERRORISTS

In
recent years, Major Hasan attended a mosque in Silver Spring Maryland
which hosted fundraising for CIA covert operations against Russia :
“Imam Faizul Khan ministered to Hasan when he worshiped at the Muslim
Community Center in Silver Spring , Md . The Muslim Community Center
has held fundraisers for Chechen jihadists, and promotes on its website
a Shariah-based financial product offered by a Muslim Brotherhood front
group under federal investigation.”[21] The essential element here is
that the mosque was raising money for Chechen rebellion, which is
notoriously a strategic tool of the United States and the United
Kingdom against Russia . Perhaps such a fundraiser for Chechen
terrorism might have been attended by Ilyas Achmadov, the de facto
ambassador of the leading CIA-backed Chechen organization implicated in
terrorism, who lives in Washington , DC at US taxpayer expense thanks
to his sponsorship by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the gray eminence of
Obama’s foreign policy team.

The impression that Major Hasan was
in fact a protected patsy is strengthened by reports that he frequented
mosques which have figured in previous intelligence operations, and
that he was in contact with an American-born Muslim cleric now living
in Yemen who currently plays the role of one of the most bombastic
agent provocateurs operating under the umbrella designation of “al
Qaeda.”

ANWAR AWLAKI, PATSY MINDER FOR HANI HANJOUR OF 9/11 INFAMY

In
earlier years, Hasan had worshipped with his mother at the radical Dar
al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church , Va. During 2001, he
worshipped there alongside some of the 9/11 patsies, specifically those
alleged to have been aboard the aircraft which allegedly struck the
Pentagon. The dominant figure of this mosque was at that time a certain
Anwar Awlaki or Awlaqi, who must be regarded as an intelligence agency
operative and patsy-minder, the latter because of his role in
supervising the alleged Pentagon suicide pilot Hani Hanjour and other
9/11 figures who frequented the mosque. Hanjour, whose purported feats
of flying would if true have placed him above the Red Baron in the
Valhalla of air aces, was in fact a pathetic and clumsy nebbish.

Just
after the Fort Hood massacre, Awlaki used his website for a bombastic
endorsement of Major Hasan and the Texas slaughter, evidently designed
with Pavlovian technique to goad Islamophobic US reactionaries into a
frenzy and give the radio ogres much grist for their mill. Here is the
relevant report from the New York Times: ‘Mr. Awlaki, an American
citizen born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, wrote on Monday on his
English-language website that Mr. Hasan was “a hero.” The cleric said,
“He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction
of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his
own people.” He added, “The only way a Muslim could Islamically justify
serving as a soldier in the U.S. Army is if his intention is to follow
the footsteps of men like Nidal.”‘[22] This was a piece of crude
manipulation, and at the same time an engraved invitation to an
anti-Moslem pogrom. The report went on: ‘But since leaving the U.S. in
2002 for London , and later Yemen , Mr. Awlaki has become a prominent
proponent of militant Islam via his Web site, www.anwar-alawlaki.com.
The Toronto Star reported last month that a group of young Canadians
charged with plotting attacks against military and government targets
were inspired, in part, by listening to Mr. Awlaki’s sermons online. In
2000 and 2001, Mr. Awlaki served as an imam at two mosques in the
United States frequented by three future 9/11 hijackers. Khalid
al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended the Rabat mosque in San Diego,
where Mr. Awlaki later admitted meeting Hazmi several times but
“claimed not to remember any specifics of what they discussed,”
according to the report of the national 9/11 commission. Both Hazmi and
another hijacker, Hani Hanjour, later attended the Dar al Hijra mosque
in Falls, Church, Virginia after Mr. Awlaki had moved there in early
2001. The 9/11 commission report expressed “suspicion” about the
coincidence, but said its investigators were unable to find Mr. Awlaki
in Yemen to question him.’[23] We should notice the nice plug given
here to Awlaki’s web site by the New York Times; his site traffic is
sure to benefit enormously. Major Hasan had taken care to establish his
devotion and fealty to Awlaki during the time leading up to the
massacre. He left no doubt that he was a disciple of Awlaki: ‘Hasan’s
eyes “lit up” when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki’s
teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base
in Texas, the scene of Thursday’s horrific shooting spree.’[24]

Major
Hasan, it transpired, had also been exchanging emails with the fiery
double agent he so much lionized; the imam-provocateur had fled abroad
after 9/11and was now operating under “al Qaeda” cover from Yemen .
According to one report: “two government officials, speaking on
condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the
case on the record, said the Washington-based joint terrorism task
force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan
and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a
Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task
force. The communications were gathered by investigators beginning in
December 2008 and continuing into early this year. That Defense
investigator wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the
communications and the Army major’s personnel file, according to these
officials. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further
investigation – in large part because his communications with the imam
were centered on a research paper about the effects of combat in Iraq
and Afghanistan and the investigator determined that Hasan was in fact
working on such a paper, the officials said. The disclosure Tuesday of
the defense investigator’s role indicated that the U.S. military was
aware of worrisome behavior by the massacre suspect long before the
attack. Just hours later, a senior defense official, also demanding
anonymity, directly contradicted that notion. The senior defense
official said neither the Army nor any other part of the Defense
Department knew of Hasan’s contacts with any Muslim extremists.
Military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies also are defending
themselves against tough questions about what each of them knew about
Hasan before he allegedly opened fire in a crowded room at the huge
military base in Texas .” [25]

AWLAKI HELPED ENTRAP FORT DIX SIX, TORONTO DUPES

The
decision of the Army to ignore Major Hasan’s correspondence with Awlaki
is all the more astounding given Awlaki’s status as one of the premier
terror impresarios of the age operating under Islamic fundamentalist
cover. More than a mere ideologue, he is a recruiter and an
entrepreneur of terror. His web site would not survive five minutes of
concerted US cyber-attacks, but he is not disturbed in his role as a
pied piper of patsies. In particular, Awlaki and his work were used to
motivate and encourage groups of mentally impaired and suggestible
young dupes who were entrapped into “terrorist plots” by busy FBI and
Canadian RCMP agents during recent years, thus keeping the boogey man
of Islamic terrorism in the public eye. ‘In addition to his contacts
with Major Nidal Hasan, the radical American cleric, Anwar al Awlaki,
served as an inspiration for men convicted in terror plots in Toronto
and Fort Dix, New Jersey, according to government officials and court
records reviewed by ABCNews.com.Despite his ties to other plots,
including the one against the Army post at Fort Dix, some 20 e-mails
between Awlaki and Major Hasan were dismissed as “innocent” by a
military investigator working on the FBI’s Joint Terror Task Force in
Washington, D.C….”He is not just a proselytizer but someone who is
operational, with deep and longstanding connections to al Qaeda and has
been for some time,” said a former senior American intelligence
official who had access to classified information. Awlaki was
characterized in court testimony as an inspiration by two of six Muslim
immigrants convicted on conspiracy and other charges in a plot to kill
U.S. military personnel at Fort Dix.In Toronto, members of the
so-called Toronto 18 watched videos of Awlaki at a makeshift training
camp where they allegedly planned an attack on the Canadian parliament
and prime minister.’[26]

YET ANOTHER DELIBERATE FBI SNAFU

Just
as in the 9/11 instance, the scandalous failure to connect the dots and
round up the patsies was due to the non-feasance and malfeasance of the
FBI, the criminally negligent agency which, according to 9/11
commission co-chair Gov. Thomas Kean, “failed and failed and failed,”
but nevertheless escaped breakup after 9/11. Starting in 1996, the FBI
had been aware that international terrorists were making a show of
learning to fly passenger jets at U.S. flight schools, but took no
action. According to a press report, the failure to inform Major
Hasan’s superiors was the direct and specific responsibility of the
FBI: “The Pentagon said it was never notified by US intelligence
agencies that they had intercepted e-mails between of the alleged Fort
Hood shooter and an extremist imam until after last week’s bloody
assaults, raising new questions about whether the government could have
helped prevent the attack. a person familiar with the matter said a
Pentagon worker on the terrorism task force overseen by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation was told about the intercepted e-mails several
months ago. But members of the terror task forces aren’t allowed to
share such information with their agencies, unless they get permission
from the FBI, which leads the task force. In this case, the Pentagon
worker, an employee from the Defense Criminal Investigations Service,,
helped make the assessment that Major Hasan wasn’t a threat, and the
FBI’s ‘procedures for sharing the information were never used,’ said
the person familiar with the matter.”[27] Those involved in this
decision by FBI and the Defense Department need to be probed as
possible terror moles. This is reminiscent of the FBI’s Dave Frasca,
who could not assemble and act on the pre-9/11intelligence he had on
his desk. This was a new chapter of the story of FBI sabotage told by
Colleen Rowley and documented at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui in
2006. If the FBI had rounded up the 9/11 patsies, the operation could
not have occurred ­ not because the patsies were going to fly planes
into buildings by themselves, but because the jailing of patsies before
the fact would have made the targeting of the Moslem world impossible.
In this sense, the same FBI rogue networks which made9/11 possible are
still in place and still effectively sabotaging effective law
enforcement.

MAJOR HASAN’S SECURITY CLEARANCE: SECRET

Major
Hasan reportedly has a security clearance which allows him to receive
secret information. All US Army officers are required to have at
minimum a secret-level security clearance, and Major Hasan’s clearance
might even have been at the more stringent top secret level. All
indications are that Major Hasan’s clearance was never reviewed,
despite his ostentatious antics. Major Hasan’s aberrant behavior should
at the very least have put him in line for a National Agency Check or
NAC. Newsweek writes that ‘extended NACs, which the officials indicated
are more likely for would-be military officers, would include checks of
local and state police records in jurisdictions where the subject
lived, as well as credit-bureau and financial-record checks. In the
event that some kind of “derogatory” information turns up during these
checks, one of the officials said, field investigators are likely to be
sent out to conduct interviews, and the procedure could also include an
interview with the security-clearance applicant.’[28] This puts Major
Hasan in a very special category, subject to special rules and
surveillance which are enforced by specific agencies, and not by
military physicians of whatever rank. Perhaps the most direct evidence
that Major Hasan was a protected patsy was the fact that he could make
incendiary speeches and correspond with self-proclaimed “al Qaeda”
firebrands without having his security clearance reviewed, to say
nothing of lifted.

As a well informed Stratfor letter to the
editor posting points out: “The contacting of a foreign Islamic
militant who openly espouses killing of Americans is, in and of itself,
is a violation of U.S. security regulations with respect to individuals
with security clearances. Hasan’s foreign contact should have been
reported through the chain-of- command to his commander. Lt. Gen. Cone,
in consultation with his G-2, Counter-Intelligence Staff Officer,
Personnel Security Officer and the CID, could have immediately
suspended Maj. Hasan’s security clearance subject to a local AR 15-6
investigation. Lt. Gen. Cone is responsible for force protection of
assets in his command, not a DoD criminal investigator. A minimally
competent investigation would have uncovered other comments and actions
that would probably have resulted in adverse command action on Maj.
Hasan’s security clearance and possibly led to charges being brought
for conduct unbecoming an officer.”[29] But the usual rules were
suspended for Majopr Hasan, indicating that he belonged to a special
class of persons ­ patsies who were being groomed for future actions
and therefore had to be kept out of trouble.

LIKE ATTA AND KSM, THE DEVOUT MAJOR HASAN LIKES STRIP CLUBS

Thanks
to the investigative work of Daniel Hopsicker, it has been revealed
that key 9/11 figure Mohammed Atta was no devout and puritanical
Moslem, but a hedonist. The legendary Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM),
touted by the controlled media as the “9/11 mastermind,” was also
devoted to alcohol, floozies, and nightlife. It is striking that Major
Hasan, allegedly a rigid and doctrinaire Moslem, also conforms to this
model. Patsies working for or manipulated by the de facto Islamic
fundamentalist directorate of Anglo-American intelligence seem to share
the same decadent western foibles. One of Major Hasan’s favorite
relaxations was to attend the local strip club: ‘Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan
came into the Starz strip club not far from the base at least three
times in the past month, the club’s general manager, Matthew Jones,
told FoxNews.com. Army investigators building their case against Hasan
plan to interview Jones soon. “The last time he was here, I remember
checking his military ID at the door, and he paid his $15 cover and
stayed for six or seven hours,” Jones, 37, said. Jennifer Jenner, who
works at Starz using the stage name Paige, said Hasan bought a lap
dance from her two nights in a row. She said he paid $50 for a dance
lasting three songs in one of the club’s private rooms on Oct. 29 and
Oct. 30. She recalled that he arrived at about 6:30 p.m. and stayed
until 2 a.m. She said he brought in a six pack of light beer, took only
a few sips from one can and gave the rest to the strippers. “He
preferred the blondes,” said Jenner, whose hair was dyed blond at the
time. “He said he was a medic and that he was being deployed soon, but
mostly he wanted to ask us questions.”‘[30] Needless to say, alcohol
and strippers do not an Islamic fundamentalist make.

As for
prominent 9/11 figure Atta, he was in fact not a practicing Moslem at
all, but rather a devotee of alcohol, cocaine, call girls, and pork
chops. Like Major Hasan, Atta preferred blondes, specifically pink
strawberry ones. He cohabited with a 22-year old call girl who may also
have been a sex operative for one of the intelligence agencies. Amanda
Keller worked for a “lingerie model escort service” in Sarasota called
Fantasies & Lace. Atta loved to attend topless bars, where he would
order lap dances at the Pink Pony, or else stuff twenty dollar bills
into the g-strings of the dancers at the Olympic Garden nightclub. He
was also a regular at Harry’s Bar in Naples. Atta’s favorite nightspots
were the Cheetah in Venice, and Margarita Maggie’s in Sarasota. FBI
investigators showing around pictures of Atta after 9/11 found that he
had been in a bar drinking Stolichnaya vodka for three hours quite
recently; with him was accused suicide pilot Marwan al Shehhi, who
preferred rum. Atta was also a frequent cocaine user. He would
habitually snort rows of cocaine with a dollar bill. Are we therefore
dealing here with two patsies from the same levy, two parallel patsy
lives?

FROM ARMY-MCCARTHY TO ARMY-LIEBERMAN

The
reactionaries of today yearn for the days of Senator Joe McCarthy
(R-Wisconsin), who launched his campaign of red-baiting and
witch-hunting some six decades ago. At the height of the Cold War,
McCarthy launched the hysterical charge that the US Army had been
massively infiltrated by agents of the international communist
conspiracy. This led to the infamous and protracted Army-McCarthy
hearings in the Senate, during which McCarthy’s influence reached its
demagogic apex. Today, the neocons are still full of rancor and
resentment over their wholesale ouster from the government through the
end of the Bush-Cheney era, and the ascendancy of the
Brzezinski-Nye-Soros faction of liberal imperialists who control Obama.
Immediately after the shootings. Now, Senator Joe Lieberman has
announced that he will use his homeland security subcommittee to
investigate the failure of the intelligence agencies to connect the
dots in the Fort Hood incident. Already, neocon web sites are
contending that the US Army of the Obama era is thoroughly infiltrated
by Islamic fundamentalists favorable to terrorism. Lieberman says he
wants to know how the Army missed numerous warning signs about Hasan’s
radical views. The Army-Lieberman hearings may soon launch an
anti-Moslem witch hunt in the US military, fulfilling much neocon
nostalgia. The best approach would be to empanel a genuinely
independent board of inquiry to investigate the Fort Hood massacre.
Care should be taken to avoid the begging of the question and the
blatant conflicts of interest which made the recent Kean-Hamilton 9/11
commission such a mockery. Care should also be taken to keep the
inevitable Lee Hamilton out of any board of inquiry, given his wretched
track record of cover-up and misprision.

FORT HOOD MOSLEM CLERIC TO MAJOR HASAN: “THERE’S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU”

The
London Daily Telegraph interviewed Osman Danquah, a local Moslem
clergyman, who had contact with Major Hasan. Osman Danquah had come to
the conclusion that Major Hasan had debilitating mental problems, and
was not suitable for any leadership roles ­ even though he was an Army
officer of the middle rank. Citing several sources, this paper writes:
‘What does seem clear is that the army missed an increasing number of
red flags that Hasan was a troubled and brooding individual within its
ranks. “I was shocked but not surprised by news of Thursday’s attack,”
said Dr Val Finnell, a fellow student on a public health course in
2007-08 who heard Hasan equate the war on terrorism to a war on Islam.
Another student had warned military officials that Hasan was a “ticking
time bomb” after he reportedly gave a presentation defending suicide
bombers. Osman Danquah, the co-founder of the Islamic Community of
Greater Killeen, said Hasan never expressed anger toward the army or
indicated any plans for violence. But he said that, at their second
meeting, Hasan seemed almost incoherent. “I told him, ‘There’s
something wrong with you’. I didn’t get the feeling he was talking for
himself, but something just didn’t seem right.” He was sufficiently
troubled that he recommended the centre reject Hasan’s request to
become a lay Muslim leader at Fort Hood .’[31]

The pathos Major
Hasan’s existence is perhaps most clearly portrayed in his unsuccessful
effort to find a wife of his own faith: ‘Relatives said that the death
of Hasan’s parents, in 1998 and 2001, turned him more devout. “After he
lost his parents he tried to replace their love by reading a lot of
books, including the Koran,” his uncle Rafiq Hamad said. “He didn’t
have a girlfriend, he didn’t dance, he didn’t go to bars.” His failed
search for a wife seemed to haunt Hasan. At the Muslim Community Centre
in the Washington suburb of Silver Spring, he signed up for an Islamic
matchmaking service, specifying that he wanted a bride who wore the
hijab and prayed five times a day.” Major Hasan returned repeatedly and
obsessively to the same theme, according to a another acquaintance:
“Adnan Haider, a retired professor of statistics, recalled how at their
first meeting last year, a casual introduction after Friday prayers,
Hasan immediately asked the academic if he knew “a nice Muslim girl” he
could marry. “It was a strange thing to ask someone you have met two
seconds before. It was clear to me he was under pressure, you could
just see it in his face,” said Prof Haider, 74, who used to work at
Georgetown University in Washington . “You could see he was lonely and
didn’t have friends.[32]

WAS MAJOR HASAN BRAINWASHED?

Given
the accumulated evidence that Major Hasan was possibly psychotic, there
remains the question of whether this psychosis might have been
endogenous and due to natural and spontaneous causes, or whether it had
been artificially produced in him through a program of brainwashing and
heavy-duty “Clockwork Orange” psychological manipulation by others. We
cannot exclude the possibility that Major Hasan went out on November 5
consciously determined to kill, and may also have discharged his
weapons. We thus have two possible scenarios: on the one hand Major
Hasan the duped patsy caught totally by surprise when the shooting
started, and on the other, Major Hasan the psychotic and criminally
insane killer who possessed the will, if not necessarily the ability,
for serious shooting. There may be evidence for both scenarios.. We
should also point out that seeing Major Hasan is a psychotic killer in
his own right does not in any way rule out the presence of additional
and more capable shooters. We are reminded here of the case of Sirhan
Sirhan, who appears to have fired at Robert Kennedy, but who also
appears to have received a powerful assist from some other as yet
unidentified more expert shooter who may have actually fired the lethal
bullet.

MAJOR HASAN’S VIRGINIA TECH CONNECTION

Where
would Major Hasan have been brainwashed? An obvious place to look would
be the precincts of Virginia Tech, the home of Cho Seung-Hui, the
alleged mass killer of 32 students and professors along with himself in
April 2007. This incident involves far too many unanswered questions to
be addressed in detail here. In any case, the fact that Major Hasan
graduated from the alma mater of Cho should be enough by itself to
raise some red flags. We should also recall that several additional
homicides have occurred in and around Virginia Tech during the last
year. In January 2009, a Virginia Tech doctoral student beheaded a
fellow student in a campus cafe. In this incident, a female graduate
student who had just arrived from China was killed when another
graduate student she knew attacked her with a knife and decapitated
her.[33] Beheadings are rare on American college campuses even today,
so this is an extraordinary event indeed. In August 2009, two Virginia
Tech University students were found murdered at a Jefferson National
Forest campground that is a popular hangout for students. The bodies of
David Lee Metzler, 19, of Lynchburg and Heidi Lynn Childs, 18, of
Forest were found by a passerby.[34]

So what in the world is
going on in or near Blacksburg , Virginia ? The report on the Virginia
Tech slayings prepared by a special commission set up by Virginia
Governor Tim Kane covers up the failure of mental health professionals
in and around Virginia Tech to take effective action in regard to Cho,
whom they had nevertheless recognized to be a profoundly disturbed and
potentially highly dangerous personality. This report commits the usual
fallacy of petition principi, begging the question, and assumes from
the start that Cho was the sole shooter.[35] Because of this failure to
account for numerous salient features of the Cho incident, this entire
case must continue to be classified as unsolved. We must therefore
conclude this essay merely by citing one of the many clues which the
Virginia investigation chose to ignore, but which might begin to
account for the extraordinary number of homicides observed in the area
of Blacksburg Virginia . As a somewhat obscure website alleges in an
unconfirmed report, “Blacksburg, VA houses a US government ABOVE TOP
SECRET underground laboratory (in the side of a local Blacksburg
mountain) that develops in conjunction with DARPA [Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency], weapons such as human robotic mind control
programming.”[36] Does such a facility exist, and what does it do? At
this point, any further comment would be pure speculation.

We
cannot be optimistic that, should he survive, a future trial of Major
Hasan will clear up these questions, any more than criminal trials
established the real facts in the cases of Sirhan Sirhan, Hinckley,
McVeigh, or John Allen Muhammad. What does appear confirmed as of now
is the existence of a mutating model of terrorism alongside the
large-scale 9/11 or WMD paradigms of false flag manipulation seen and
propagandized during the last decade. In this sense, Major Hasan
represents the evolution of the figures of Cho, and also of Steven P.
Kazmierczak, the Northern Illinois University shooter of February 2008.
As I wrote last year, “The new model is Virginia Tech gunman Cho, a
mentally disturbed or brainwashed mass killer. Another case was that of
Steven P. Kazmierczak, who in mid-February 2008 shot 21 people and
killed five of them at Northern Illinois University in Dekalb.
Kazmierczak was described as being intensely concerned with
“corrections, political violence, and peace and social justice.”[37]

Will
the American public ever learn to see through and reject false flag
operations, as many Spaniards were able to do after the Madrid bombs?
Will Americans ever swear off the dangerous habit of being duped? Will
opinion leaders ever master the rather elementary methods of rogue
network, false-flag terrorism? Until this occurs and the gullibility of
the public is reduced, such operations are likely to continue on scales
both small and large, with incalculable consequences for the future of
humanity.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
ScoutsHonor

avatar

Posts : 1360
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Wed 25 Nov 2009, 9:59 am

matterik wrote:
I dont think they give a dam anymore what the public thinks. Personally I dont check the media anymore. I see the entire media as a sorcerer, an entity, interested in controlling consciousness. I believe it is also. They know that the ultimate aim for them is to control the minds. This is what they are up to. They bombard us with facts and fiction, information overload, they give us fear and open corruption, soup operas and intrigue. The media, all it ever wants, is our attention. It is just like hollywood, which is another branch of the same media that controlls the news agencies.

Neither do I. The problem is, where do we now turn for information about what's happening in the world? This is no minor problem.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Wed 02 Dec 2009, 3:51 am

The Seattle shooting is more topical I know, but this piece is even better than Webster's.

http://paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?221506

Major Hasan of Fort Hood: A Patsy In A Drill Gone Live?

Wednesday November 18, 2009 (1546 PST)

In the wake of the massacre at Fort Hood Texas , two principal theories
have emerged to explain the conduct of the accused shooter, identified
by the U.S. Army as Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist of
Jordanian-Palestinian ancestry. One of these theories is embraced by
left liberals and other supporters and acolytes of the Obama regime,
and argues that Major Hasan is a sincere and devout Muslim who was the
victim of a tragic contradiction between his religious faith and the
logic of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, both the heritage of the odious
Bush-Cheney regime. According to this version, Hasan must be viewed as
a troubled and tormented individual who “snapped,” breaking down
psychologically under the stress of his awful predicament. Here is how
Obama summed up this approach: “Even within the extraordinary military
that we have — and I think everybody understands how outstanding the
young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress — there
are going to be instances in which an individual cracks.” (New York
Times, 10 Nov and ember 2009) Calling Major Hasan a terrorist amounts,
in this view, to racism and vindictive prejudice.

The other theory is the one advocated by assorted neocons,
reactionaries, Islamophobes and others generally hostile to Obama. This
account maintains that Major Hasan was a homegrown, self-starting
Islamic terrorist, trumpeting his devotion to jihad and suicide
bombing, seeking to make contact with “Al Qaeda,” and generally filled
with hate for America , for freedom, and for his fellow soldiers. In
this view, it is only the pervasive political correctness and
multicultural obsession of the subversive-riddled and soft on terrorism
Obama regime that prevented Major Hasan from being neutralized before
he could act, and which prevents Obama and his Democratic allies from
telling the truth after the fact.

These views are both superficial, naïve, and inadequate.[1] They amount
to two prongs of an articulated campaign of media hysteria and mass
manipulation designed on the one hand to prod the dithering Wall Street
puppet Obama * who is having second thoughts about his own political
survival — into an early decision in favor of massive escalation of the
war in Afghanistan for the purpose of hastening the breakup of
Pakistan, and thus threatening China. On the other hand, the delirium
of Islamophobic hatred being ginned up against Major Hasan by the usual
cast of reactionary radio ogres (Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin) seeks
to accentuate and strengthen the racist and xenophobic elements in the
militant anti-Obama opposition, in particular among the Tea Party
movement. The decision to put the infamous Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and
his confreres on trail in New York City, plus the recent government
seizure of numerous US mosques and other buildings on the grounds that
they are Iranian assets, also contribute to a growing mood of
anti-Moslem hysteria. This atmosphere is accentuated by the reckless
and irresponsible actions of some Moslem groups which happen to be
foundation-funded, and must thus be considered as part of the apparatus
of US domestic social control.

The media narrative which is now being consolidated a week after the
shootings is full of contradictions, embarrassed silences, and
absurdities. A third and distinct approach to this case is therefore
required, one which regards Major Hasan as a manipulated patsy in the
context of a relatively sophisticated operation mounted by forces
within the US intelligence community, using methods and assets which by
now ought to have become familiar. Major Hasan can be seen as a mixture
of Lee Harvey Oswald, legendary 9/11 “suicide pilot” Mohammed Atta, and
Cho Seung-Hui (the alleged April 2007 Virginia Tech shooter). He also
has elements of reputed Robert Kennedy assassin Sirhan Sirhan, and of
John Hinckley Jr., who was involved in an attempt to kill President
Reagan * both of whom survived the operations in which they were
implicated. He thus represents a new cocktail of patsy ingredients.
Until now, Islamic terrorists had come in collectivist groups, and not
alone. Major Hasan by contrast is a troubled loner in the tradition of
Oswald, at the same time that he embodies the religious fanaticism of
Atta, along with some of his peccadilloes. Major Hasan is that novelty,
a troubled Islamic fundamentalist loner, even though this is something
of a contradiction in terms. Like Cho, Major Hasan emerges from the
psychiatric clinic, in his case as a practicing psychiatrist, but as a
shrink with egregious symptoms of his own. Like all patsies, Major
Hasan combines the flamboyant and bombastic proclamation of his
personal creed with a seeming immunity from bureaucratic
countermeasures which would normally be automatic in shutting him down.
Hasan is revealed as a fanatic, a misfit, and a quasi-psychotic or
psychotic mental case in his own right * who could not subsist without
protectors in high places of the US intelligence community.

In my 2005 book 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism, I argued that 9/11 and other
recent terrorist attacks represented provocations cynically
orchestrated by privately controlled rogue networks operating within
the US intelligence agencies for purposes of mass political
manipulation. Starting from an overview of terrorist actions from the
Gunpowder Plot of 1605 through 9/11, I developed a method of analysis
of state-sponsored false flag terrorism which distinguished the roles
of fanatical, duped, or psychotic patsies like Oswald, of subversive
moles ensconced as officials within government agencies, and of
technicians or professional killers who actually create the observed
effects, all commanded and coordinated from outside of government, and
all operating within the atmosphere of mass brainwashing provided by
the Wall Street media. I also highlighted the role of drills and
exercises which are hijacked and turned into real-world terror attacks.
In order to understand the Fort Hood massacre, it is indispensable to
apply this method here as well.

TROOPS THOUGHT IT WAS A DRILL * DID MAJOR HASAN THINK SO TOO?

In investigations like this, it is generally a great mistake to fixate
on the scapegoat dished up by the mass media. The more we focus on the
Oswald of the day, the less we understand of what actually happened.
Let us turn away from the TV pundits, and listen instead to the
eyewitness testimony of the troops who were present at the shootings.
Many of them are on record agreeing that the events of November 5 were
initially interpreted by those on the scene as an exercise, as a drill.
Emphasis will be added to bring out this central fact.

From ABC News we get the following testimony: Solider Keara Bono ‘told
“Good Morning America” today that she initially thought the scene of
Hasan standing up, praising Allah and starting to fire was a drill. She
didn’t believe it was real even when she felt her own blood, she said.
“Then I looked to my left and right and I saw people that were
bleeding,” she said. That’s when Bono realized that Hasan’s rampage
wasn’t a drill.’ (ABC News GMA)[2]

In the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel of 9 November 2009 we find: “Pfc.
Amber Bahr of Random Lake [ Wisconsin ] heard someone yelling and
ducked at the sound of gunfire, but she said she thought supervisors at
Fort Hood were holding a drill last Thursday. She didn’t know she was
under live fire until she heard people screaming.”[3] This story was
based on an interview given to NBC’s Today show.

CBS News reported: “Two days after narrowly escaping death at Fort Hood
and just hours after his release from the hospital, Corporal Nathan
Hewitt still can’t believe what happened was real. The survivor spoke
to CBS News Correspondent Don Teague about those fateful minutes. Even
after being shot, Hewitt didn’t believe what was happening. He thought
the gunfire was a training exercise and that he’d been hit by a rubber
bullet. He says other victims thought the same thing.”[4]

ABC newsman Bob Woodruff found further corroboration of this general
impression when he was allowed to interview shooting victims who were
recovering in the hospital: “For many of the 43 people wounded when an
Army psychiatrist allegedly went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood,
the scene was unreal — it seemed like something out of a movie. Maybe
it was a drill. .Capt. Dorrie Carskadon, a combat stress specialist
from Wisconsin , who was at Fort Hood training for a deployment to
Afghanistan , said she initially thought the shooting was a drill.”[5]
Notice that this testimony comes from a field grade officer, a captain.

The Austin television station KXAN provides the following evidence:
‘Spc. Scott Hamrick and First Sergeant James McLeod made it out of the
Soldier Readiness Processing Center alive after some maneuvering to get
away from the suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. “My initial thought is
that it was a drill,” said Hamrick. “Because you know you’re always
getting drilled for situations.” However, what Hamrick thought was a
drill turned out to be something closer to war at home.’[6]

The Miami Herald furnished this account: ‘For Skip Blancett, the senior
pastor at the First United Methodist Church of Killeen, news of the
shooting left him anguishing for hours because his daughter, Hollye
Davis, was at a building next door to where the gunman started firing.
She and others were in lockdown for hours. Without a cellphone, she
couldn’t call home. “They had no idea what was going on; everyone
thought it was a drill at first,” Blancett said.’[7]

The idea that the shooting was part of a drill or exercise was so
widespread that it had to be expressly countered in the first emergency
announcement posted on the Fort Hood web site, which read: “Effective
immediately. Fort Hood is closed. Organizations/units are instructed to
execute a 100 per cent accountability of all personnel. This is not a
drill. It is an emergency situation.”[8]

Based on this testimony, it seems clear that unannounced, surprise
terror drills are standard operating procedure at Fort Hood and
probably other military bases as well. They are frequent enough to be
the first thing many soldiers, including at least one officer, thought
was happening. Drills are designed to be as realistic as possible. But
the acme of realism is reality * real killing, which can occur through
small but decisive changes in the unfolding of the drill. We may
therefore be dealing here with a drill which has been taken live or
flipped live, as so often happens in terror incidents.[9]

This array of evidence allows us to pose the following question: If so
many of the Army personnel on the scene thought at first that the
incident was a drill, did Major Hasan also think he was attending a
drill? Did he imagine that he was going to be an actor playing the
assigned role of a member of the terrorist red team in a realistic
exercise? In other words, was this inept, troubled and quasi-psychotic
individual somehow under the impression that he was attending an
officially sanctioned exercise of some routine type, until real bullets
began to be fired by other more qualified shooters, thus taking the
drill live? This might also help us to account for the extraordinary
intensity of firing at the scene * well over 100 rounds. For this
working hypothesis to stand up, we would have to show that there were
other gunmen firing * gunmen who knew that the drill was turning into a
real massacre. The additional shooters would according to the
classification referred to above represent the technicians in this
action * the trained killers who have the ability to do the things that
the patsy is accused of doing. Interestingly enough, extra gunmen are
exactly what we find.

ONE SHOOTER, OR THREE?

How many shooters were there? Early reports indicated that there were
at least one, and perhaps two, in addition to Major Hasan. Dow Jones
newswires reported at about 5 PM Eastern Time: “A second gunman is in
custody after a shooting at the Army’s Fort Hood in Texas in which at
least seven people were killed and 12 wounded, reports KCEN-TV of Waco.
The report comes about two hours after a first suspect was captured,
shortly after gunfire broke out.”[10] According to the Dow Jones report
cited, shooting had occurred in two separate locations on the Fort Hood
base: “The incident reportedly began at Fort Hood ’s theater and then
moved to the Soldier Readiness Processing Center , Killeen City Public
Information Officer Hillary Shine told Fox News.” According to an AP
wire, these facts were also announced by an official Army spokesman at
the base: “The spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Nathan Banks, says two
shooters were apparently involved. There is no word yet on who they
were, nor on identities of the dead. Banks says the second incident
took place at a theater on the sprawling base.” [11] Many of the
embarrassing reports about multiple shooters have been purged after the
fact from websites, but a few have survived, as in the case of this
Wisconsin radio station, where we read that the triple assassin theory
had been embraced by the commander of the base: “Newsradio 620 WTMJ:
Lt. General Bob Cone at Fort Hood confirms 12 dead, 31 hurt in
shooting. Soldier gunman killed. 2 others in custody.”[12] During the
later afternoon, cable television talked of three shooters, and in the
London Daily Mirror account we find: “Twelve people were killed and 31
wounded when three gunmen in uniform opened fire at the US Army’s
largest armoured base in Texas yesterday. One gunman was shot by
civilian police and the two others held at Fort Hood .”[13]

GEN. CONE BRINGS MAJOR HASAN BACK FROM THE DEAD AFTER 8 HOURS

It was only in the late evening that the official lone assassin version
of these events was assembled in another press conference by General
Cone held about eight hours after the shooting had started: ” KILLEEN ,
Texas (KXAN/AP/MSNBC) – Twelve died and another 31 were hurt in a mass
shooting on Fort Hood that stunned the nation on Thursday. Accused
gunman Major Malik Nidal Hasan is alive and in stable condition, Lt.
Gen. Bob Cone said at a Thursday evening news conference just outside
the storied military post – the largest in the United States . Counter
to initial reports, the 39-year-old psychiatrist – who was thought to
be killed by local police – is hospitalized and not expected to die of
multiple gunshots wounds sustained during the 1:30 p.m. attack. The
local police officer who allegedly shot Hasan and injured him is in the
hospital also in stable condition.”[14]

In the course of the day, we had thus gone from three shooters to only
one. The separate shooting incident at the Howze theater on the post
reported earlier had also been expunged in the process. Most remarkable
of all was the ability of Major Hasan to come back from the dead after
eight hours in which the world had been assured of his demise. Such
resurrection is of course a physical impossibility for mere mortals.
When individuals are alleged to have performed deeds which are
physically impossible in the world as we know it, from Oswald’s feats
of shooting to Atta’s (and Hani Hjanjour’s) feats of flying, we must
become suspicious that intelligence agencies are assisting the probable
patsies in hidden ways. Major Hasan is said to have fired more than 100
rounds using the two pistols he is alleged to have carried. This seems
like a lot of shooting for a single person surrounded by scores of
trained combat veteran soldiers, even if these latter had not been
carrying their usual weapons.

The categorical imperative for every patsy is to get noticed, and to
call attention to himself or herself pointedly and repeatedly, by hook
or by crook. They must stand out so much that they will be remembered
by many ordinary people after the process of their demonization has
been launched. In order to fulfill their function, patsies must leave a
trail of clues and evidence which will tie themselves and the larger
target group they supposedly represent to the heinous actions they will
shortly be accused of having committed. Oswald handed out leaflets
sympathetic to Cuba and told a television audience that he was a
Marxist. He went to the USSR, and tried to go to Cuba. Atta cultivated
a frightening stare, and took time to argue ostentatiously about a
parking place at an airport in Maine while he allegedly thought he was
on his way to death. Major Hasan seems to have some of the same strange
proclivities. On the day of the shooting, Major Hasan made sure there
was no doubt about his religious loyalties by donning a trademark
“Islamic” white robe and skull cap to go to his local Seven-Eleven,
where he was sure to be filmed by the security cameras there. This
footage was then played on all the networks for the next 48 hours. This
gesture recalls the Koran Atta left in his car at Boston ’s Logan
airport. When the FBI located Atta’s rented car, they found a copy of
the Koran, airline schedules, terrorist literature and videotapes, and
Atta’s crudely forged last will and testament in the luggage * all
obviously and crudely left behind to make the necessary point. Atta’s
will betrayed the amateurish attempt of some half-baked area specialist
to sound Islamic

At Fort Hood , Major Hasan ‘told a colleague, Col Terry Lee, that he
believed Muslims should rise up against American “aggressors.”‘ [15]
Count de Borchgrave points out that Major Hasan had made at least one
overtly ominous statement just before the shooting spree: ‘As the
Virginia-born major told a female neighbor in his apartment complex,
“I’m going to do good work for God.”‘[16] The neighbor would not forget
that grim pledge anytime soon. Major Hasan was suspected of having
authored internet postings that compared suicide bombers with soldiers
who throw themselves on hand grenades to save others, although here we
must be cautious, since these postings could have been made by
imposters. All accounts agree that witnesses heard a shout of “Allahu
Akbar” just before the firing started. Less clear is whether these
words were spoken by Major Hasan. And if he did say them, was this a
line from the scenario script of a drill?

MAJOR HASAN’S RANT TO MILITARY DOCTORS: “WE LOVE DEATH MORE THAN YOU LOVE LIFE”

The most elaborate attempts by Major Hasan to assert and establish a
thoroughly Islamic profile for himself came in the form of a lecture at
the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda ,
Maryland . He was supposed to present a paper on an issue of medical or
clinical interest, but instead elected to make a ranting speech about
the oppression of Moslems in the US military and the dangerous
consequences this was sure to have. Here are some relevant parts of the
account published by Dana Priest in the Washington Post: ‘The Army
psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood warned a
roomful of senior Army physicians a year and a half ago that to avoid
“adverse events,” the military should allow Muslim soldiers to be
released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against
other Muslims. The title of Hasan’s PowerPoint presentation was “The
Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.”
Under a slide titled “Comments,” he wrote: “If Muslim groups can
convince Muslims that they are fighting for God against injustices of
the ‘infidels’; ie: enemies of Islam, then Muslims can become a potent
adversary ie: suicide bombing, etc.” [sic] The last bullet point on
that page reads simply: “We love death more then [sic] you love life!”
Under the “Conclusions” page, Hasan wrote that “Fighting to establish
an Islamic State to please God, even by force, is condoned by the
Islam,” and that “Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that
renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly — will
vary!” The final page, labeled “Recommendation,” contained only one
suggestion: “Department of Defense should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers
the option of being released as ‘Conscientious objectors’ to increase
troop morale and decrease adverse events.”‘[17]

Objections were made to Major Hasan’s tirade: “Students on a 2007-2008
master’s programme at a military college revealed that they had
complained to faculty about Major Hasan’s alleged anti-American views.
They included him giving a presentation that justified suicide bombing
and telling classmates that Islamic law trumped the US
Constitution.”[18] But nothing serious happened. According to National
Public Radio’s Joseph Shapiro, the worst thing that happened was that
Hasan was given a period of probation early in his postgraduate work
because of his insistence on seeking to convert to Islam some coworkers
and the soldiers he was treating.

The title of this speech, “The Koranic World View As It Relates to
Muslims in the U.S. Military,” sounds very academic and not very
Islamic at all. It seems to imply that Islam and the Koran are just a
world view or Weltanschauung among others. It falls far short of the
basic Islamic fundamentalist claim to represent the authority of
absolute revealed truth. We are reminded of Mohamed Atta’s will and
instructions for his own funeral, which Islamic experts have found to
be replete with elements and formulations utterly alien to Islam.

The categorical imperative for every mole is to protect the relevant
patsies from investigation or arrest until the terror event has
occurred and it is time to round the patsies up as scapegoats. The part
about “We love death more then [sic] you love life!” is blatant ID
format “Al Qaeda” speak, and in a military setting this speech would
normally be more than enough to trigger a probing investigation into
Major Hasan’s activities and belief structure. But no serious
consequences ensued, suggesting that Major Hasan was an asset who was
being protected for the sake of some future mission which he was being
groomed and prepared to perform.

Thus, while Hasan’s medical superiors were aware of him as a problem
case, they chose to do nothing: a ” group of doctors overseeing Nidal
Malik Hasan’s medical training discussed concerns about his overly
zealous religious views and strange behavior months before the Army
major was accused of opening fire on soldiers and civilians at Fort
Hood , Texas . Doctors and staff overseeing Hasan’s training viewed him
at times as belligerent, defensive and argumentative in his frequent
discussions of his Muslim faith, a military official familiar with
several group discussions about Hasan said. As a psychiatrist in
training, Hasan was characterized in meetings as a mediocre student and
lazy worker, a matter of concern among the doctors and staff at Walter
Reed Army Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University of the
Health Sciences military medical school, the official said.” (AP, 11
November 2009 )[19] At the same time, the training of a psychiatrist
involves intensive psychological profiling an depth analysis by
professors as an integral part of the training. As a shrink among
shrinks, Major Hasan’s psychology must have been well known to the
military doctors who were his professors. This opens up an avenue for
manipulating and controlling him which has not been present in other
terrorism cases. Did one or more of the Major Hasan’s analysts have a
sideline as terrorist controllers and mind benders working for the
rogue network?

WALTER REED OFFICIALS ASKED: “WAS HASAN PSYCHOTIC?”

A more explicit and illuminating version of Major Hasan’s psychiatric
review comes from National Public Radio. Here we find that he was
variously evaluated as “disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and
schizoid.” This raised the problem of whether he was actually psychotic
and thus suffering from severe mental illness: ‘Starting in the spring
of 2008, key officials from Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences held a series of
meetings and conversations, in part about Maj. Nidal Hasan.One of the
questions they pondered: Was Hasan psychotic? Both fellow students and
faculty were deeply troubled by Hasan’s behavior – which they variously
called disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and schizoid. The
officials say he antagonized some students and faculty by espousing
what they perceived to be extremist Islamic views. His supervisors at
Walter Reed had even reprimanded him for telling at least one patient
that “Islam can save your soul.” Hasan spent six years as a
psychiatrist at Walter Reed, beginning in 2003, and he had a fellowship
at USUHS until shortly before he went to Fort Hood in the summer of
2009. A committee of officials from both places regularly meets once a
month to discuss pressing topics surrounding the psychiatrists and
other mental health professionals who train and work at the
institutions. Participants in the spring meeting and in subsequent
conversations about Hasan reportedly included John Bradley, chief of
psychiatry at Walter Reed; Robert Ursano, chairman of the Psychiatry
Department at USUHS; Charles Engel, assistant chair of the Psychiatry
Department and director of Hasan’s psychiatry fellowship; Dr. David
Benedek, another assistant chairman of psychiatry at USUHS;
psychiatrist Carroll J. Diebold; and Scott Moran, director of the
psychiatric residency program at Walter Reed, according to colleagues
and other sources who monitor the meetings.’[20] Why did this august
panel not take any practical steps in regard to Major Hasan? This
account blames bureaucratic inertia and political correctness founded
on the fear of seeming to discriminate against Moslems. But these
reasons need to be supplemented with another possibility: that a
witting mole (or moles) was shielding Major Hasan from any sanctions so
he could go on to greater things as a witting or unwitting agent
provocateur and patsy.

continued in next post
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Wed 02 Dec 2009, 3:52 am

continued

One comment included in this NPR account was especially ominous:
“Another official reportedly wondered aloud to colleagues whether Hasan
might be capable of committing fratricide, like the Muslim U.S. Army
sergeant who, in 2003, killed two fellow soldiers and injured 14 others
by setting off grenades at a base in Kuwait .” Despite such real and
present dangers, nothing was done.

MAJOR HASAN’S MOSQUE LINKED TO THE CIA’S CHECHEN TERRORISTS

In recent years, Major Hasan attended a mosque in Silver Spring
Maryland which hosted fundraising for CIA covert operations against
Russia : “Imam Faizul Khan ministered to Hasan when he worshiped at the
Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring , Md . The Muslim Community
Center has held fundraisers for Chechen jihadists, and promotes on its
website a Shariah-based financial product offered by a Muslim
Brotherhood front group under federal investigation.”[21] The essential
element here is that the mosque was raising money for Chechen
rebellion, which is notoriously a strategic tool of the United States
and the United Kingdom against Russia . Perhaps such a fundraiser for
Chechen terrorism might have been attended by Ilyas Achmadov, the de
facto ambassador of the leading CIA-backed Chechen organization
implicated in terrorism, who lives in Washington , DC at US taxpayer
expense thanks to his sponsorship by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the gray
eminence of Obama’s foreign policy team.

The impression that Major Hasan was in fact a protected patsy is
strengthened by reports that he frequented mosques which have figured
in previous intelligence operations, and that he was in contact with an
American-born Muslim cleric now living in Yemen who currently plays the
role of one of the most bombastic agent provocateurs operating under
the umbrella designation of “al Qaeda.”

ANWAR AWLAKI, PATSY MINDER FOR HANI HANJOUR OF 9/11 INFAMY

In earlier years, Hasan had worshipped with his mother at the radical
Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church , Va. During 2001, he
worshipped there alongside some of the 9/11 patsies, specifically those
alleged to have been aboard the aircraft which allegedly struck the
Pentagon. The dominant figure of this mosque was at that time a certain
Anwar Awlaki or Awlaqi, who must be regarded as an intelligence agency
operative and patsy-minder, the latter because of his role in
supervising the alleged Pentagon suicide pilot Hani Hanjour and other
9/11 figures who frequented the mosque. Hanjour, whose purported feats
of flying would if true have placed him above the Red Baron in the
Valhalla of air aces, was in fact a pathetic and clumsy nebbish.

Just after the Fort Hood massacre, Awlaki used his website for a
bombastic endorsement of Major Hasan and the Texas slaughter, evidently
designed with Pavlovian technique to goad Islamophobic US reactionaries
into a frenzy and give the radio ogres much grist for their mill. Here
is the relevant report from the New York Times: ‘Mr. Awlaki, an
American citizen born in New Mexico to Yemeni parents, wrote on Monday
on his English-language website that Mr. Hasan was “a hero.” The cleric
said, “He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the
contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting
against his own people.” He added, “The only way a Muslim could
Islamically justify serving as a soldier in the U.S. Army is if his
intention is to follow the footsteps of men like Nidal.”‘[22] This was
a piece of crude manipulation, and at the same time an engraved
invitation to an anti-Moslem pogrom. The report went on: ‘But since
leaving the U.S. in 2002 for London , and later Yemen , Mr. Awlaki has
become a prominent proponent of militant Islam via his Web site, www.anwar-alawlaki.com.
The Toronto Star reported last month that a group of young Canadians
charged with plotting attacks against military and government targets
were inspired, in part, by listening to Mr. Awlaki’s sermons online. In
2000 and 2001, Mr. Awlaki served as an imam at two mosques in the
United States frequented by three future 9/11 hijackers. Khalid
al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi attended the Rabat mosque in San Diego,
where Mr. Awlaki later admitted meeting Hazmi several times but
“claimed not to remember any specifics of what they discussed,”
according to the report of the national 9/11 commission. Both Hazmi and
another hijacker, Hani Hanjour, later attended the Dar al Hijra mosque
in Falls, Church, Virginia after Mr. Awlaki had moved there in early
2001. The 9/11 commission report expressed “suspicion” about the
coincidence, but said its investigators were unable to find Mr. Awlaki
in Yemen to question him.’[23] We should notice the nice plug given
here to Awlaki’s web site by the New York Times; his site traffic is
sure to benefit enormously. Major Hasan had taken care to establish his
devotion and fealty to Awlaki during the time leading up to the
massacre. He left no doubt that he was a disciple of Awlaki: ‘Hasan’s
eyes “lit up” when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki’s
teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base
in Texas, the scene of Thursday’s horrific shooting spree.’[24]


Major Hasan, it transpired, had also been exchanging emails with the
fiery double agent he so much lionized; the imam-provocateur had fled
abroad after 9/11and was now operating under “al Qaeda” cover from
Yemen . According to one report: “two government officials, speaking on
condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the
case on the record, said the Washington-based joint terrorism task
force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan
and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a
Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task
force. The communications were gathered by investigators beginning in
December 2008 and continuing into early this year. That Defense
investigator wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the
communications and the Army major’s personnel file, according to these
officials. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further
investigation – in large part because his communications with the imam
were centered on a research paper about the effects of combat in Iraq
and Afghanistan and the investigator determined that Hasan was in fact
working on such a paper, the officials said. The disclosure Tuesday of
the defense investigator’s role indicated that the U.S. military was
aware of worrisome behavior by the massacre suspect long before the
attack. Just hours later, a senior defense official, also demanding
anonymity, directly contradicted that notion. The senior defense
official said neither the Army nor any other part of the Defense
Department knew of Hasan’s contacts with any Muslim extremists.
Military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies also are defending
themselves against tough questions about what each of them knew about
Hasan before he allegedly opened fire in a crowded room at the huge
military base in Texas .” [25]

AWLAKI HELPED ENTRAP FORT DIX SIX, TORONTO DUPES

The decision of the Army to ignore Major Hasan’s correspondence with
Awlaki is all the more astounding given Awlaki’s status as one of the
premier terror impresarios of the age operating under Islamic
fundamentalist cover. More than a mere ideologue, he is a recruiter and
an entrepreneur of terror. His web site would not survive five minutes
of concerted US cyber-attacks, but he is not disturbed in his role as a
pied piper of patsies. In particular, Awlaki and his work were used to
motivate and encourage groups of mentally impaired and suggestible
young dupes who were entrapped into “terrorist plots” by busy FBI and
Canadian RCMP agents during recent years, thus keeping the boogey man
of Islamic terrorism in the public eye. ‘In addition to his contacts
with Major Nidal Hasan, the radical American cleric, Anwar al Awlaki,
served as an inspiration for men convicted in terror plots in Toronto
and Fort Dix, New Jersey, according to government officials and court
records reviewed by ABCNews.com.Despite his ties to other plots,
including the one against the Army post at Fort Dix, some 20 e-mails
between Awlaki and Major Hasan were dismissed as “innocent” by a
military investigator working on the FBI’s Joint Terror Task Force in
Washington, D.C….”He is not just a proselytizer but someone who is
operational, with deep and longstanding connections to al Qaeda and has
been for some time,” said a former senior American intelligence
official who had access to classified information. Awlaki was
characterized in court testimony as an inspiration by two of six Muslim
immigrants convicted on conspiracy and other charges in a plot to kill
U.S. military personnel at Fort Dix.In Toronto, members of the
so-called Toronto 18 watched videos of Awlaki at a makeshift training
camp where they allegedly planned an attack on the Canadian parliament
and prime minister.’[26]

YET ANOTHER DELIBERATE FBI SNAFU

Just as in the 9/11 instance, the scandalous failure to connect the
dots and round up the patsies was due to the non-feasance and
malfeasance of the FBI, the criminally negligent agency which,
according to 9/11 commission co-chair Gov. Thomas Kean, “failed and
failed and failed,” but nevertheless escaped breakup after 9/11.
Starting in 1996, the FBI had been aware that international terrorists
were making a show of learning to fly passenger jets at U.S. flight
schools, but took no action. According to a press report, the failure
to inform Major Hasan’s superiors was the direct and specific
responsibility of the FBI: “The Pentagon said it was never notified by
US intelligence agencies that they had intercepted e-mails between of
the alleged Fort Hood shooter and an extremist imam until after last
week’s bloody assaults, raising new questions about whether the
government could have helped prevent the attack. a person familiar with
the matter said a Pentagon worker on the terrorism task force overseen
by the Federal Bureau of Investigation was told about the intercepted
e-mails several months ago. But members of the terror task forces
aren’t allowed to share such information with their agencies, unless
they get permission from the FBI, which leads the task force. In this
case, the Pentagon worker, an employee from the Defense Criminal
Investigations Service,, helped make the assessment that Major Hasan
wasn’t a threat, and the FBI’s ‘procedures for sharing the information
were never used,’ said the person familiar with the matter.”[27] Those
involved in this decision by FBI and the Defense Department need to be
probed as possible terror moles. This is reminiscent of the FBI’s Dave
Frasca, who could not assemble and act on the pre-9/11intelligence he
had on his desk. This was a new chapter of the story of FBI sabotage
told by Colleen Rowley and documented at the trial of Zacarias
Moussaoui in 2006. If the FBI had rounded up the 9/11 patsies, the
operation could not have occurred * not because the patsies were going
to fly planes into buildings by themselves, but because the jailing of
patsies before the fact would have made the targeting of the Moslem
world impossible. In this sense, the same FBI rogue networks which
made9/11 possible are still in place and still effectively sabotaging
effective law enforcement.

MAJOR HASAN’S SECURITY CLEARANCE: SECRET

Major Hasan reportedly has a security clearance which allows him to
receive secret information. All US Army officers are required to have
at minimum a secret-level security clearance, and Major Hasan’s
clearance might even have been at the more stringent top secret level.
All indications are that Major Hasan’s clearance was never reviewed,
despite his ostentatious antics. Major Hasan’s aberrant behavior should
at the very least have put him in line for a National Agency Check or
NAC. Newsweek writes that ‘extended NACs, which the officials indicated
are more likely for would-be military officers, would include checks of
local and state police records in jurisdictions where the subject
lived, as well as credit-bureau and financial-record checks. In the
event that some kind of “derogatory” information turns up during these
checks, one of the officials said, field investigators are likely to be
sent out to conduct interviews, and the procedure could also include an
interview with the security-clearance applicant.’[28] This puts Major
Hasan in a very special category, subject to special rules and
surveillance which are enforced by specific agencies, and not by
military physicians of whatever rank. Perhaps the most direct evidence
that Major Hasan was a protected patsy was the fact that he could make
incendiary speeches and correspond with self-proclaimed “al Qaeda”
firebrands without having his security clearance reviewed, to say
nothing of lifted.

As a well informed Stratfor letter to the editor posting points out:
“The contacting of a foreign Islamic militant who openly espouses
killing of Americans is, in and of itself, is a violation of U.S.
security regulations with respect to individuals with security
clearances. Hasan’s foreign contact should have been reported through
the chain-of- command to his commander. Lt. Gen. Cone, in consultation
with his G-2, Counter-Intelligence Staff Officer, Personnel Security
Officer and the CID, could have immediately suspended Maj. Hasan’s
security clearance subject to a local AR 15-6 investigation. Lt. Gen.
Cone is responsible for force protection of assets in his command, not
a DoD criminal investigator. A minimally competent investigation would
have uncovered other comments and actions that would probably have
resulted in adverse command action on Maj. Hasan’s security clearance
and possibly led to charges being brought for conduct unbecoming an
officer.”[29] But the usual rules were suspended for Majopr Hasan,
indicating that he belonged to a special class of persons * patsies who
were being groomed for future actions and therefore had to be kept out
of trouble.

LIKE ATTA AND KSM, THE DEVOUT MAJOR HASAN LIKES STRIP CLUBS

Thanks to the investigative work of Daniel Hopsicker, it has been
revealed that key 9/11 figure Mohammed Atta was no devout and
puritanical Moslem, but a hedonist. The legendary Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed (KSM), touted by the controlled media as the “9/11
mastermind,” was also devoted to alcohol, floozies, and nightlife. It
is striking that Major Hasan, allegedly a rigid and doctrinaire Moslem,
also conforms to this model. Patsies working for or manipulated by the
de facto Islamic fundamentalist directorate of Anglo-American
intelligence seem to share the same decadent western foibles. One of
Major Hasan’s favorite relaxations was to attend the local strip club:
‘Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan came into the Starz strip club not far from the
base at least three times in the past month, the club’s general
manager, Matthew Jones, told FoxNews.com. Army investigators building
their case against Hasan plan to interview Jones soon. “The last time
he was here, I remember checking his military ID at the door, and he
paid his $15 cover and stayed for six or seven hours,” Jones, 37, said.
Jennifer Jenner, who works at Starz using the stage name Paige, said
Hasan bought a lap dance from her two nights in a row. She said he paid
$50 for a dance lasting three songs in one of the club’s private rooms
on Oct. 29 and Oct. 30. She recalled that he arrived at about 6:30 p.m.
and stayed until 2 a.m. She said he brought in a six pack of light
beer, took only a few sips from one can and gave the rest to the
strippers. “He preferred the blondes,” said Jenner, whose hair was dyed
blond at the time. “He said he was a medic and that he was being
deployed soon, but mostly he wanted to ask us questions.”‘[30] Needless
to say, alcohol and strippers do not an Islamic fundamentalist make.

As for prominent 9/11 figure Atta, he was in fact not a practicing
Moslem at all, but rather a devotee of alcohol, cocaine, call girls,
and pork chops. Like Major Hasan, Atta preferred blondes, specifically
pink strawberry ones. He cohabited with a 22-year old call girl who may
also have been a sex operative for one of the intelligence agencies.
Amanda Keller worked for a “lingerie model escort service” in Sarasota
called Fantasies & Lace. Atta loved to attend topless bars, where
he would order lap dances at the Pink Pony, or else stuff twenty dollar
bills into the g-strings of the dancers at the Olympic Garden
nightclub. He was also a regular at Harry’s Bar in Naples. Atta’s
favorite nightspots were the Cheetah in Venice, and Margarita Maggie’s
in Sarasota. FBI investigators showing around pictures of Atta after
9/11 found that he had been in a bar drinking Stolichnaya vodka for
three hours quite recently; with him was accused suicide pilot Marwan
al Shehhi, who preferred rum. Atta was also a frequent cocaine user. He
would habitually snort rows of cocaine with a dollar bill. Are we
therefore dealing here with two patsies from the same levy, two
parallel patsy lives?

FROM ARMY-MCCARTHY TO ARMY-LIEBERMAN

The reactionaries of today yearn for the days of Senator Joe McCarthy
(R-Wisconsin), who launched his campaign of red-baiting and
witch-hunting some six decades ago. At the height of the Cold War,
McCarthy launched the hysterical charge that the US Army had been
massively infiltrated by agents of the international communist
conspiracy. This led to the infamous and protracted Army-McCarthy
hearings in the Senate, during which McCarthy’s influence reached its
demagogic apex. Today, the neocons are still full of rancor and
resentment over their wholesale ouster from the government through the
end of the Bush-Cheney era, and the ascendancy of the
Brzezinski-Nye-Soros faction of liberal imperialists who control Obama.
Immediately after the shootings. Now, Senator Joe Lieberman has
announced that he will use his homeland security subcommittee to
investigate the failure of the intelligence agencies to connect the
dots in the Fort Hood incident. Already, neocon web sites are
contending that the US Army of the Obama era is thoroughly infiltrated
by Islamic fundamentalists favorable to terrorism. Lieberman says he
wants to know how the Army missed numerous warning signs about Hasan’s
radical views. The Army-Lieberman hearings may soon launch an
anti-Moslem witch hunt in the US military, fulfilling much neocon
nostalgia. The best approach would be to empanel a genuinely
independent board of inquiry to investigate the Fort Hood massacre.
Care should be taken to avoid the begging of the question and the
blatant conflicts of interest which made the recent Kean-Hamilton 9/11
commission such a mockery. Care should also be taken to keep the
inevitable Lee Hamilton out of any board of inquiry, given his wretched
track record of cover-up and misprision.

FORT HOOD MOSLEM CLERIC TO MAJOR HASAN: “THERE’S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU”

The London Daily Telegraph interviewed Osman Danquah, a local Moslem
clergyman, who had contact with Major Hasan. Osman Danquah had come to
the conclusion that Major Hasan had debilitating mental problems, and
was not suitable for any leadership roles * even though he was an Army
officer of the middle rank. Citing several sources, this paper writes:
‘What does seem clear is that the army missed an increasing number of
red flags that Hasan was a troubled and brooding individual within its
ranks. “I was shocked but not surprised by news of Thursday’s attack,”
said Dr Val Finnell, a fellow student on a public health course in
2007-08 who heard Hasan equate the war on terrorism to a war on Islam.
Another student had warned military officials that Hasan was a “ticking
time bomb” after he reportedly gave a presentation defending suicide
bombers. Osman Danquah, the co-founder of the Islamic Community of
Greater Killeen, said Hasan never expressed anger toward the army or
indicated any plans for violence. But he said that, at their second
meeting, Hasan seemed almost incoherent. “I told him, ‘There’s
something wrong with you’. I didn’t get the feeling he was talking for
himself, but something just didn’t seem right.” He was sufficiently
troubled that he recommended the centre reject Hasan’s request to
become a lay Muslim leader at Fort Hood .’[31]

The pathos Major Hasan’s existence is perhaps most clearly portrayed in
his unsuccessful effort to find a wife of his own faith: ‘Relatives
said that the death of Hasan’s parents, in 1998 and 2001, turned him
more devout. “After he lost his parents he tried to replace their love
by reading a lot of books, including the Koran,” his uncle Rafiq Hamad
said. “He didn’t have a girlfriend, he didn’t dance, he didn’t go to
bars.” His failed search for a wife seemed to haunt Hasan. At the
Muslim Community Centre in the Washington suburb of Silver Spring, he
signed up for an Islamic matchmaking service, specifying that he wanted
a bride who wore the hijab and prayed five times a day.” Major Hasan
returned repeatedly and obsessively to the same theme, according to a
another acquaintance: “Adnan Haider, a retired professor of statistics,
recalled how at their first meeting last year, a casual introduction
after Friday prayers, Hasan immediately asked the academic if he knew
“a nice Muslim girl” he could marry. “It was a strange thing to ask
someone you have met two seconds before. It was clear to me he was
under pressure, you could just see it in his face,” said Prof Haider,
74, who used to work at Georgetown University in Washington . “You
could see he was lonely and didn’t have friends.[32]

WAS MAJOR HASAN BRAINWASHED?

Given the accumulated evidence that Major Hasan was possibly psychotic,
there remains the question of whether this psychosis might have been
endogenous and due to natural and spontaneous causes, or whether it had
been artificially produced in him through a program of brainwashing and
heavy-duty “Clockwork Orange” psychological manipulation by others. We
cannot exclude the possibility that Major Hasan went out on November 5
consciously determined to kill, and may also have discharged his
weapons. We thus have two possible scenarios: on the one hand Major
Hasan the duped patsy caught totally by surprise when the shooting
started, and on the other, Major Hasan the psychotic and criminally
insane killer who possessed the will, if not necessarily the ability,
for serious shooting. There may be evidence for both scenarios.. We
should also point out that seeing Major Hasan is a psychotic killer in
his own right does not in any way rule out the presence of additional
and more capable shooters. We are reminded here of the case of Sirhan
Sirhan, who appears to have fired at Robert Kennedy, but who also
appears to have received a powerful assist from some other as yet
unidentified more expert shooter who may have actually fired the lethal
bullet.

MAJOR HASAN’S VIRGINIA TECH CONNECTION

Where would Major Hasan have been brainwashed? An obvious place to look
would be the precincts of Virginia Tech, the home of Cho Seung-Hui, the
alleged mass killer of 32 students and professors along with himself in
April 2007. This incident involves far too many unanswered questions to
be addressed in detail here. In any case, the fact that Major Hasan
graduated from the alma mater of Cho should be enough by itself to
raise some red flags. We should also recall that several additional
homicides have occurred in and around Virginia Tech during the last
year. In January 2009, a Virginia Tech doctoral student beheaded a
fellow student in a campus cafe. In this incident, a female graduate
student who had just arrived from China was killed when another
graduate student she knew attacked her with a knife and decapitated
her.[33] Beheadings are rare on American college campuses even today,
so this is an extraordinary event indeed. In August 2009, two Virginia
Tech University students were found murdered at a Jefferson National
Forest campground that is a popular hangout for students. The bodies of
David Lee Metzler, 19, of Lynchburg and Heidi Lynn Childs, 18, of
Forest were found by a passerby.[34]

So what in the world is going on in or near Blacksburg , Virginia ? The
report on the Virginia Tech slayings prepared by a special commission
set up by Virginia Governor Tim Kane covers up the failure of mental
health professionals in and around Virginia Tech to take effective
action in regard to Cho, whom they had nevertheless recognized to be a
profoundly disturbed and potentially highly dangerous personality. This
report commits the usual fallacy of petition principi, begging the
question, and assumes from the start that Cho was the sole shooter.[35]
Because of this failure to account for numerous salient features of the
Cho incident, this entire case must continue to be classified as
unsolved. We must therefore conclude this essay merely by citing one of
the many clues which the Virginia investigation chose to ignore, but
which might begin to account for the extraordinary number of homicides
observed in the area of Blacksburg Virginia . As a somewhat obscure
website alleges in an unconfirmed report, “Blacksburg, VA houses a US
government ABOVE TOP SECRET underground laboratory (in the side of a
local Blacksburg mountain) that develops in conjunction with DARPA
[Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency], weapons such as human
robotic mind control programming.”[36] Does such a facility exist, and
what does it do? At this point, any further comment would be pure
speculation.

We cannot be optimistic that, should he survive, a future trial of
Major Hasan will clear up these questions, any more than criminal
trials established the real facts in the cases of Sirhan Sirhan,
Hinckley, McVeigh, or John Allen Muhammad. What does appear confirmed
as of now is the existence of a mutating model of terrorism alongside
the large-scale 9/11 or WMD paradigms of false flag manipulation seen
and propagandized during the last decade. In this sense, Major Hasan
represents the evolution of the figures of Cho, and also of Steven P.
Kazmierczak, the Northern Illinois University shooter of February 2008.
As I wrote last year, “The new model is Virginia Tech gunman Cho, a
mentally disturbed or brainwashed mass killer. Another case was that of
Steven P. Kazmierczak, who in mid-February 2008 shot 21 people and
killed five of them at Northern Illinois University in Dekalb.
Kazmierczak was described as being intensely concerned with
“corrections, political violence, and peace and social justice.”[37]

Will the American public ever learn to see through and reject false
flag operations, as many Spaniards were able to do after the Madrid
bombs? Will Americans ever swear off the dangerous habit of being
duped? Will opinion leaders ever master the rather elementary methods
of rogue network, false-flag terrorism? Until this occurs and the
gullibility of the public is reduced, such operations are likely to
continue on scales both small and large, with incalculable consequences
for the future of humanity.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sat 05 Dec 2009, 2:51 pm

I just got a morning dose of National Public Radio (NLP) programming, I caught the tail end of a piece about Clemmons and the Seattle shooting. Here's my take on what I heard:

Oversight by prison releasing Clemmons from prison blah blah blah, Governor of Washington not accepting parolees from Arkansas blah blah blah, tearful blah blah blah from wife of dead cop, etc.

How come early news reports of multiple shooters have been buried? (Official story not fully manufactured yet) Why haven't we heard from the barrista and other witnesses that were inside the coffee shop? (currently being de programmed ala the Columbine kid) How did Clemmons manage to grab a cop's gun as he was escaping, wounded, from the scene of the 'crime'. (was Clemmons even there?) Why are cops gunning down 'suspects' (in the back) on the side of the road. (already met speeding ticket quota for month)

That's what I want to know, not banal drivel from taxpayer funded Neuro Linguistic Programming (NPR) radio. I know I'm asking too much, though I don't expect anything besides bullshit.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
ScoutsHonor

avatar

Posts : 1360
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sat 05 Dec 2009, 7:13 pm

That just about covers it all for me, Ramallama. A brilliant analysis IMHO, which *says it all.*

Sigh.

P.S. I personally (& without proof) do not believe that Clemmons had a damn thing to do with any of it. That's why he's conveniently dead.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sat 05 Dec 2009, 7:51 pm

Thanks ScoutsHonor, I agree about the Clemmons non-involvement. I 'read into' a few pieces that he was paranoid about the government and may have been a 'prepper' of sorts. Heaven forbid having loose canon conspiracy theorists running around spouting their crazy ideas...
Back to top Go down
View user profile
incognito

avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2009-10-20
Location : in the rainforest

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 07 Mar 2010, 5:36 pm

Well done piece here though most people have purged this event from the memory...

http://www.examiner.com/x-23316-Madison-Independent-Examiner~y2009m11d10-Ft-Hood-Official-story-full-of-holes#

Any topic that can be construed as a conspiracy theory is a writers' worst nightmare. That label has negative connotations and writing about anything that can be put in that category usually creates more problems than it is worth. It generates hate mail from both sides of the political spectrum and that is a headache that most writers would rather not deal with.

One of the ironies in dealing with the plethora of information that is available through print, television and electronic media is that it often does not add up and at times is contradictory. The more information there is, the more inconsistencies that can be found. That does not make any topic a conspiracy theory, it just makes it what it is...questionable. A good example is what allegedly happened at Ft. Hood last week.

For the record, any theories regarding what happened at Ft. Hood are up to readers to make. This commentary will not try to tell you what happened, but the information at hand does suggest what did not happen. Yet again it is the "official" story that should be questioned. You can come to your own conclusions. I must, however, start with a few conversations I have had with ex-military personnel since the incident.

After the horrible massacre at Ft. Hood, I spoke with a few people who served in the military. A retired army Capt. who served 7 years in the 173rd Airborne including time as a S-3 in a RSTA squadron said this: "There is no way a psychiatrist - basically an intellectual desk jockey - shot off hundreds of rounds with two pistols and hit about 40 people without being subdued by someone. Come on! He wasn't a trained assassin or a special ops commando shooting up a mall. He would have had to reload and that means putting one of the pistols down and reloading the other with seasoned combat vets in that deployment center. It only takes seconds to reload, but it only takes a second to subdue him."

A retired MP, Michael Martinez also said: "No way! That would be impossible. Even if he had two semi-auto pistols [according to early reports he used a 9mm and a .357 revolver to gun down over 40 people] he would still have had to stop to reload and someone would have jumped his ass. Most people on base aren't carrying [weapons], but MPs are and they would have been there in a heartbeat."

SFC Donald Buswell said, "I spent 10 years at Ft Hood. There is no way this 'official' story is legitimate. No way would a room full of combat vets allow this one shooter to get off over 100 rounds! And, it is not normal for the outside security guards to be there. They are at the MP station, and at the main gates. This means the room full of soldiers processing must have been pinned down; multiple shooters is the only plausible scenario. This sounds like Maj. Hasan has been used, and perhaps is a patsy."

Michael Gaddy, an army veteran of Vietnam, Beirut and Grenada writes: "The facts as presented by the Army and the media [about] the shooting at Fort Hood just don’t compute. People on the ground have told me cell phone towers were jammed to prevent unauthorized dissemination of information after the shooting."

A look at these articles in chronological order paints a very confusing picture. I am not even going to speculate on what really happened at Ft. Hood, but my bovine excrement meter is maxing out at the official story. I encourage you to read and come to your own conclusions.

Lori Price, writing for Citizens for Legitimate Government, did an excellent job of compiling articles from the media that came out in the early moments and the aftermath of the shootings. Here are some of her articles as well as some that I have found.

Nov. 5, 2009: Lt. Gen. Bob Cone, the commander of III Corps, said that at least one gunman opened fire at the base's Soldiers Readiness Processing Center where soldiers were receiving medical and dental exams prior to deployment. The gunman's fire was returned (Cone did not say by whom) and the gunman was killed. "The shooter was killed. He was a soldier. We since then have apprehended two additional soldiers who are suspects, and I would go into the point that there were eyewitness accounts that there may have been more than one shooter."

Nov. 5, 2009: CNN reports that a senior officer who was playing golf near Fort Hood, Texas, told CNN he witnessed the arrest of one of the two surviving suspects of the shooting at the Army installation. After being told by MPs to clear the area, he ducked into a nearby house for cover as 30 to 40 cars carrying more MPs approached. He said he saw a soldier in battle-dress uniform, his hands in the air. The MPs ordered him to lie on the ground and open his uniform, presumably to ensure he was not carrying explosives, the senior officer said. He said an MP told him that authorities considered the man to be a suspect in the shootings after having overheard the man say he was with the shooter. The man was surrounded for 25 to 30 minutes, until a convoy of vehicles arrived, led by a Ford Crown Victoria and carrying men in suits, and he was taken away, the senior officer said.

Nov. 5, 2009: In an interview with Fox News, a man claiming to be the suspect's cousin, Nader Hasan, said that Major Hasan considered an upcoming deployment to Iraq "his worst nightmare." Nader Hasan added that his cousin wasn't violent, telling Fox News: "He wasn't somebody who even enjoyed going to the firing range." It was unclear whether Hasan acted alone. Lt. Gen. Cone said three soldiers who'd been taken into custody as possible accomplices had been released.

Nov. 5, 2009: Federal law enforcement officials say the suspected Ft. Hood shooter had come to their attention at least six months ago because of internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats. He is a graduate of Virginia Tech University, where he was a member of the ROTC and earned a bachelor's degree in biochemistry in 1997. He received his medical degree from the military's Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., in 2001. At Walter Reed, he did his internship, residency and a fellowship.

Nov. 5, 2009: The New York Times reports: Clad in a military uniform and firing an automatic pistol and another weapon, Major Hasan, a balding, chubby-faced man with heavy eyebrows, sprayed bullets inside a crowded medical processing center for soldiers returning from or about to be sent overseas, military officials said. The victims, nearly all military personnel but including two civilians, were cut down in clusters, the officials said. Three other soldiers, their roles unclear, were taken into custody in connection with the rampage. The office of Representative John Carter, Republican of Texas, said they were later released, but a Fort Hood spokesman could not confirm that.

Nov. 6, 2009: Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, about to be deployed to a combat zone overseas, shouted a religious slogan in Arabic before going on the rampage at the Central Texas base Thursday, the base commander said. Lt. Gen. Robert Cone said that witnesses heard Hasan exclaim "Allahu Akbar!" before opening fire. The phrase means "God is great!" in Arabic. Early Thursday, Hasan showed no signs of worry or stress when he stopped at 7-Eleven for his daily breakfast of hash browns, said Jeannie Strickland, the store's manager. “He came in (Thursday) morning just like normal,” she said.

Nov. 6, 2009: CNN, however, claims he was wearing religious clothing and supposedly has a video to prove it. Federal law enforcement officials then told the Associated Press that Hasan had come to their attention at least six months ago because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings and other threats. CNN also reports that Hasan used a FN 5.7-millimeter pistol, a semi-automatic with a high-velocity 20-round capacity (unlike a 9mm) purchased legally at Guns Galore, a Killeen gun shop and another gun, identified only as a type of revolver. The high casualty rate is attributed to the "more than 100 rounds" fired by the gunman and the relatively small size of the room. More than 100 rounds fired means Hasam would have had to reload at least five times in close quarters with combat veterans surrounding him.

Nov. 6, 2009: From the Guardian UK. Ford Hood's deputy base commander, Colonel John G Rossi, said about 500 soldiers were in the area when Hasan entered the facility wearing a military uniform. He shot some victims at close range and others were injured as the bullets ricocheted, Rossi said. Troops are not allowed to carry firearms on the base and armed military police quickly swarmed to the scene. The base went into lockdown for several hours amid fears other gunmen were involved.

Nov. 7, 2009: The LA Times reports, Hasan, who had prayed at his mosque that morning, allegedly mumbled something to himself -- it may have been a prayer -- then jumped up. Witnesses reported that he said: "Allahu akbar," Arabic for "God is great." Inside the Readiness Center, Pfc. Marquest Smith, 21, was in a cubicle, across the desk from an employee, finishing paperwork ahead of his deployment in January to Afghanistan. Smith dragged several victims outside and returned to help others. He kept hearing popping. Then a pause. Then whispers: "He's reloading!" Smith saw the gunman, whose back was to him. He ran outside. The gunman fired after him. It takes seconds to place a new magazine into a pistol's grip; the gunman reloaded more than once, investigators said, and moved around the crowded room in a half-moon pattern before going outside into a courtyard.

Nov. 7, 2009: AP report claims that at least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades. They had not confirmed Hasan is the author of the posting, and a formal investigation had not been opened before the shooting, said law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the case. Federal authorities seized Hasan's computer Friday during a search of his apartment in Killeen, Texas, said a U.S. military official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.

Confusing enough yet? Now let's simplify it:

Major Nidal Malik Hasan prayed at the same mosque as two of the September 11 terrorists, according to a report published in the Sunday Telegraph. According to ABC news, U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Hasan was attempting to make contact with an individual associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.

Now there are a few problems. The first is that if Hasan was being watched for six months and intelligence agencies knew of his ties to a radical cleric, why didn't anyone do anything about him before he shot up an army base? Is domestic spying worthless? (rhetorical question). Secondly, a search of his computers by law enforcement agencies revealed no communications with any terrorist organizations, and it is safe bet that all of his cell phone records, electronic transactions and everything else about his life have been scrutinized by now. Yet nothing? And thirdly, he's still alive and not talking. Not again mentioning the supposed fact that one highly trained desk jockey managed to fire hundreds of rounds from a semi-auto pistol and a revolver, hitting over 40 people, some of them repeatedly, in a building full of combat-trained soldiers.
Sounds to me like the intell boys have a lot of explaining to do. My bovine excrement meter is off the chart... How about yours?

Update: 12 Nov 2009. The official victims count now stand at 13 dead and 29 wounded. Here's a link from SOTT.net with some video clips to corraborate some of the news stories referenced above.

Update: 13 Nov 2009. Yet more 'inaccuracies" come to light.
For more info:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6519392/Fort-Hood-shootings-gunman-used-cop-killer-weapon-in-massacre-at-US-Army-base.html
http://www.legitgov.org/attack_on_fort_hood_051109.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/gaddy/gaddy72.1.html
http://pcworld.about.com/od/wirelessphonesvoip/Should-Cell-Phone-Jamming-be-L.htm
http://www.legitgov.org/attack_on_fort_hood_051109.html
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/78425.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/05/texas.fort.hood.witnesses/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572448,00.html
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BPNHDO6&show_article=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/us/06forthood.html?_r=3
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6706442.html
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/06/fort.hood.suspect/index.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/06/fort-hood-shooter-alive
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fort-hood-shootings7-2009nov07,0,3880566,full.story
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jwXtdoKPsNJg9PPKF7708ZC4N56AD9BQ8F500
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fort-hood-shooter-contact-al-qaeda-terrorists-officials/story?id=9030873
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/08/national/main5578580.shtml
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/us/10inquire.html
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-23316-Madison-Independent-Examiner~y2009m11d13-Ft-Hood-Yet-more-media-inaccuracy
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Unmutual

avatar

Posts : 112
Join date : 2009-10-25

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sun 07 Mar 2010, 8:38 pm

This is an excellent summary. Thanks for posting. Here's some things that totally jumped out at me:

"People on the ground have told me cell phone towers were jammed to prevent unauthorized dissemination of information after the shooting."

"The man was surrounded for 25 to 30 minutes, until a convoy of vehicles arrived, led by a Ford Crown Victoria and carrying men in suits, and he was taken away, the senior officer said."

"Three other soldiers, their roles unclear, were taken into custody in connection with the rampage."

" More than 100 rounds fired means Hasam would have had to reload at least five times in close quarters with combat veterans surrounding him."

"if Hasan was being watched for six months and intelligence agencies knew of his ties to a
radical cleric, why didn't anyone do anything about him before he shot up an army base?"

"a search of his computers by law enforcement agencies revealed no communications with any terrorist organizations, and it is safe bet that all of his cell phone records, electronic transactions and everything else about his life have been scrutinized by now. Yet nothing?"

"he's still alive and not talking"

We all seem to be targets for this kind of patsy setup. Good thing that no one with a brain seems to believe the front story.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
ScoutsHonor

avatar

Posts : 1360
Join date : 2009-10-20

PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   Sat 10 Apr 2010, 1:18 am

Major Nidal Hasan waiting to be moved from hospital to jail







KCEN
It's been 5 months since the Ft. Hood shooting massacre. The gunman accused of the deadly massacre, Major Nidal Hasan, is preparing to be moved from the hospital to jail.
Hasan's attorney John Galligan, says doctors have given his client the green light to be released from the hospital. But earlier Thursday night, Galligan said that Hasan was still at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio and is still waiting to be moved to the Bell County jail.
It's certain Major Nidal Hasan will soon call the Bell County jail his home for the next 6 months, but what is uncertain is exactly when he'll arrive. Hasan's attorney says he's furious about being left out in the dark. Fort Hood and the Bell County sheriff would not confirm anything today.
"For all I know they can move him in the dark of night. He would not appear on the jail roster and I'd be lucky to get a pao announcement if one is made," Galligan said.
Galligan spoke to Hasan this morning on the phone. The army apparently isn't telling the accused gunman when he'll be transferred.
"The money could be better spent tending to his medical needs. The money could've been better spent furnishing our mitigation specialist that I've been asking for," Galligan added.
And we're learning a little more about Hasan's living arrangements. His cell will have a handicap accessible shower, his own bathroom and a bed with an air mattress. And he'll have an armed guard with him 24-7.
Galligan thinks that's a waste of money since Hasan is paralyzed and not a flight risk.


Meanwhile, Galligan will ask the army and sheriff's department to arrange meetings with Hasan on Fort Hood.

The army has charged Major Hasan with 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the November fifth massacre at Fort Hood. He is also charged with 13 premeditated murder charges for those who lost their lives.
Hasan's first hearing is set for June first on Fort Hood.

http://www.cbs19.tv/Global/story.asp?S=12245646

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: More Ft Hood Unreality   

Back to top Go down
 
More Ft Hood Unreality
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 2Go to page : 1, 2  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Ft Hood soldier needing milk for 3 month old
» 1916 Gas Hood and Bag
» 429 Squadron
» Have a little extra in Killeen/Harker Heights/Ft. Hood area
» DOD Slapping Fort Hood Survivors With Gag Orders

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWWS :: Main Forums :: Current Information Operations (IO)-
Jump to: